2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotechnological potential of respiring Zymomonas mobilis: A stoichiometric analysis of its central metabolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
45
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…As a model bioethanol producer, Zymomonas mobilis has attracted considerable attention over the past decades due to its excellent industrial characteristics, such as the unique Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway under anaerobic conditions resulting in low cell mass formation, high specific rate of sugar uptake, high ethanol yield, notable ethanol tolerance, and the generally regarded as safe (GRAS) status (Panesar et al 2006;Rogers et al 2007). Furthermore, the availability of multiple genome sequences for 12 Zymomonas strains with small genome size around 2 Mb (Seo et al 2005;Yang et al 2009a;Zhao et al 2012), multiple genome-scale metabolic models (Kalnenieks et al 2014;Pentjuss et al 2013;Widiastuti et al 2011), and versatile genetic engineering strategies (Jia et al 2013;Shui et al 2015;Tan et al 2016) also accelerates the research progress in Z. mobilis. Z. mobilis has also been engineered for the production of sorbitol, gluconic acid, levan, 2,3-butanediol, isobutanol, and other biochemicals, which is proposed as an ideal microbial chassis for future synthetic biology and biorefinery (He et al 2014;Yang et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a model bioethanol producer, Zymomonas mobilis has attracted considerable attention over the past decades due to its excellent industrial characteristics, such as the unique Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway under anaerobic conditions resulting in low cell mass formation, high specific rate of sugar uptake, high ethanol yield, notable ethanol tolerance, and the generally regarded as safe (GRAS) status (Panesar et al 2006;Rogers et al 2007). Furthermore, the availability of multiple genome sequences for 12 Zymomonas strains with small genome size around 2 Mb (Seo et al 2005;Yang et al 2009a;Zhao et al 2012), multiple genome-scale metabolic models (Kalnenieks et al 2014;Pentjuss et al 2013;Widiastuti et al 2011), and versatile genetic engineering strategies (Jia et al 2013;Shui et al 2015;Tan et al 2016) also accelerates the research progress in Z. mobilis. Z. mobilis has also been engineered for the production of sorbitol, gluconic acid, levan, 2,3-butanediol, isobutanol, and other biochemicals, which is proposed as an ideal microbial chassis for future synthetic biology and biorefinery (He et al 2014;Yang et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can occur because Zymomonas mobilis growth is independent of ethanol synthesis. Due to this peculiarity, Z. mobilis is considered to be an excellent ethanol producer (Yamashita et al, 2008;Pentjuss et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zymomonas mobilis is highlighted in the literature as a promising microorganism for ethanol and other products of technological interest production such as the gum levan (or fructan) mainly due to its capacity to tolerate high ethanol and sugar concentrations, produce low biomass concentration, use the Entner-Doudoroff metabolic pathway for carbohydrate metabolism and show cell growth regardless of carbon consumption (Behera, Mohanty, & Ray, 2012;Pentjuss, Kostromins, Fell, Stalidzans, & Kalnenieks, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often when optimizing flux distribution, only the best flux is assessed (Pentjuss, et al, 2013a). More advanced approach is to look for the best possible flux distribution, when biomass growth is taking place, to make the bioconversion more efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first stoichiometric models of Z. mobilis were published without available metabolic model files (Lee et al, 2010;Tsantili et al, 2007;Widiastuti et al, 2011) and therefore were not directly applicable for modeling and optimization. In this study the stoichiometric model of Z. mobilis central metabolism (Pentjuss, et al, 2013a) is used. The model does not include the fluxes from the central metabolism to biomass growth, and therefore would be valid for non-growing cells, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%