Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: A Single Surgeon Series Reported at a Minimum of 10 Years Follow-Up

Mehra, Aseem; Berryman, Fiona; Matharu, Gulraj S.; Pynsent, Paul; Isbister, E.S.

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.042

Cited by 33 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, small components are sensitive to malposition, which can lead to edge loading, increased wear, and pseudotumor 14,15 . Our findings regarding implant design confirm those from joint registries 1,2,10 , designing surgeons 27,29 , and independent centers 15,30,31 , and support using the BHR in appropriately selected patients. Although others have reported hip dysplasia and osteonecrosis as risk factors for MoMHR failure 10,11,27 , this was not observed in our study.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Hip Resurfacing Revision

Matharu

Judge

Murray

et al. 2016

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Hip Resurfacing Revision

Matharu

Judge

Murray

et al. 2016

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is one of the limitations of this study. Numerous published literatures [5,9,16,22,25] reported excellent short-to mid-term outcomes in HRA. The significantly longer surgical time in HRA group can be explained by more complexity and higher technique demanding of this procedure.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Yet, the fact is surgeons differ in their use of HRA and LDH MoM THA. Favorable short-to long-term clinical results make many surgeons consider HRA as an effective surgical intervention in a selected population of young patients [3,8,13,16,[23][24][25]. On the other hand, the use of LDH MoM THA is discontinued because of high incidence of early failure due to the taper wear [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients—a minimum of five year follow-up

Tao

Liu

et al. 2018

International Orthopaedics (SICOT)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This specific conventional guide was chosen since many reports have reported good long-term results of HRA using the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. [5][6][7]…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A single-use, size-specific, nylon arthroplasty guide: a preliminary study for hip resurfacing

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: In arthroplasty surgery, positioning of the components must be accurate and reproducible to avoid complications. Conventional guides are often used to align a component, but they require surgical skill and experience, and are prone to error. To this end, a single-use, size-specific, nylon guide (single-use nylon guide) has been developed for the purpose of increasing the accuracy without adding extra cost to the operation. The effectiveness of this type of guide was evaluated in using a synthetic bone study. Methods: A total of 66 synthetic femurs with the same osteoarthritic morphology were prepared. 3 surgeons participated in the experiments, and each surgeon created a drill hole for the femoral component by using the single-use nylon guide or a commercially-available, conventional, metal, neck-based guide (conventional guide). Anteversion, inclination, and insertion point acquired by the guide were compared between the guides, between surgeons, and to the computer-based plan. Results: Anteversion acquired by the single-use nylon guide (6.7° [4.9–11.5°]) was significantly closer to the plan (14.6°) than that acquired by the conventional guide (4.3° [2.4–8.6°]) ( p = 0.03). The insertion point was also significantly closer to the plan for the single-use nylon guide (3.8 mm ± 1.6 mm) than the conventional guide (5.7 mm ± 2.4 mm) ( p < 0.001). No significant difference was found for the inclination ( p = 0.76). Conclusion: A single-use, size-specific nylon guide was effective in acquiring a higher accuracy and precision in anteversion and insertion point than a conventional guide in this synthetic bone, hip resurfacing arthroplasty study. The use of single-use guides in other orthopaedic procedures should be explored.

show abstract

Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: A Single Surgeon Series Reported at a Minimum of 10 Years Follow-Up

Cited by 33 publications

References 36 publications

Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Hip Resurfacing Revision

Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Hip Resurfacing Revision

A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients—a minimum of five year follow-up

A single-use, size-specific, nylon arthroplasty guide: a preliminary study for hip resurfacing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About