Bispectral Index-Guided General Anesthesia in Combination with Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Reduces Recovery Time in Fast-Track Colon Surgery: Retracted

Mayer, Jochen; Boldt, Joachim; Schellhaaß, A.; Hiller, Björn

doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000260566.39244.bd

Cited by 18 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The median time from publication to retraction was 31 months (mean 39 mo, range 1–130 mo). Most of the retracted articles were clinical trials (81 articles [79%]) . The remainder consisted of reviews (12 [12%]), retrospective studies (5 [5%]), and case reports (4 [4%]) .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Retracted Publications in the Drug Literature

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent studies have suggested an increase in the number of retracted scientific publications. It is unclear how broadly the issue of misleading and fraudulent publications pertains to retractions of drug therapy studies. Therefore, we sought to determine the trends and factors associated with retracted publications in drug therapy literature. A PubMed search was conducted to identify retracted drug therapy articles published from 2000-2011. Articles were grouped according to reason for retraction, which was classified as scientific misconduct or error. Scientific misconduct was further divided into data fabrication, data falsification, questions of data veracity, unethical author conduct, and plagiarism. Error was defined as duplicate publication, scientific mistake, journal error, or unstated reasons. Additional data were extracted from the retracted articles, including type of article, funding source, author information, therapeutic area, and retraction issue. A total of 742 retractions were identified from 2000-2011 in the general biomedical literature, and 102 drug studies met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 73 articles (72%) were retracted for a reason classified as scientific misconduct, whereas 29 articles (28%) were retracted for error. Among the 73 articles classified as scientific misconduct, those classified as unethical author conduct (32 articles [44%]) and data fabrication (24 articles [33%]) constituted the majority. The median time from publication of the original article to retraction was 31 months (range 1-130). Fifty percent of retracted articles did not state a funding source, whereas pharmaceutical manufacturer funding accounted for only 13 articles (13%) analyzed. Many retractions were due to repeat offenses by a small number of authors, with nearly 40% of the retracted studies associated with two individuals. We found that a greater proportion of drug therapy articles were retracted for reasons of misconduct and fraud compared with other biomedical studies. It is important for health care practitioners to monitor the literature for retractions so that recommendations for drug therapy and patient management may be modified accordingly.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Retracted Publications in the Drug Literature

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…z Anon 142 -a systematic review comparing BIS against standard practice, but pre-dating the Cochrane review by Punjasawadwong et al 34 Primary research other than RCTs (three studies): Weber et al 149 Publication retracted by journal (one publication) z Mayer et al 76 Comorbidities:…”

Section: Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of depth of anaesthesia monitoring (E-Entropy, Bispectral Index and Narcotrend): a systematic review and economic evaluation

Shepherd

Jones²,

Frampton³

et al. 2013

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Mayer and colleagues (16) found that propofol cost was 5.8±11.4 cents kg -1 hour -1 in the BIS group, and 7.5±1.6 cents kg -1 hour -1 in the control group (p<0.05).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

The Effect of BIS Usage on Anaesthetic Agent Consumption, Haemodynamics and Recovery Time in Supratentorial Mass Surgery

Karaca¹,

Akçıl²,

Dilmen³

et al. 2014

Turk J Anesth Reanim

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Bispectral Index-Guided General Anesthesia in Combination with Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Reduces Recovery Time in Fast-Track Colon Surgery: Retracted

Abstract: BIS-guided IV anesthesia in combination with thoracic epidural analgesia facilitates rapid recovery and reduces the overall cost of care in patients undergoing fast-track colon surgery.

Cited by 18 publications

References 16 publications

Retracted Publications in the Drug Literature

Retracted Publications in the Drug Literature

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of depth of anaesthesia monitoring (E-Entropy, Bispectral Index and Narcotrend): a systematic review and economic evaluation

The Effect of BIS Usage on Anaesthetic Agent Consumption, Haemodynamics and Recovery Time in Supratentorial Mass Surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About