Biting Force and chewing efficiency of Conventional and CAD/CAM complete dentures. A Cross-over Study

Ragheb, Nourhan; Ibrahim, Wafaa

doi:10.21608/edj.2021.77671.1648

Egyptian Dental Journal

2021

DOI: 10.21608/edj.2021.77671.1648

|View full text |Cite

Biting Force and chewing efficiency of Conventional and CAD/CAM complete dentures. A Cross-over Study

Nourhan Ragheb

Wafaa Ibrahim

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Assessing the Current Landscape and Future Directions of Digital Denture Technology

Saini,

Zafar,

Adanir

et al. 2024

European Journal of General Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital dentures are removable dental prostheses fabricated using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. This study aimed to explore the trends in digital dentures. A comprehensive four-phase search and selection strategy was framed.Dimensions and Lens.org databases were used. Boolean operators were used to combine keywords.The most significant growth occurred by 2021, with 71 publications and 984 citations. Egypt had the highest publication rankings, with 46 total publications (TP) and 45 total citations (TC). The University of Geneva played a significant role in contributing to 16 TP and 491 TC. Egyptian Dental Journal ranked at the top. The group with four authors had an even higher number of authorships, with a total of 60. The top four keywords were CAD/CAM, 3D printing, CAD-CAM, complete denture, and digital dentistry. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms, Ninth Edition, was referenced 614 times and had the highest average number of citations (75.2). The top three writers had strong relationships with the three sources and preferred to publish using four keywords. The 11-author group, cluster 6, had the highest level of network cooperation.In conclusion, research on digital dentures has grown in terms of number of articles and citations.

show abstract

Assessing the Current Landscape and Future Directions of Digital Denture Technology

Saini,

Zafar,

Adanir

et al. 2024

European Journal of General Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Evaluation of masticatory performance and patient satisfaction for conventional and 3D-printed implant overdentures: a randomized crossover study

Nabil,

Mahanna,

Said

2024

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This crossover clinical study aimed to evaluate and compare masticatory performance and patient satisfaction for patients rehabilitated with conventional heat-cured acrylic resin and 3D-printed mandibular implant overdentures retained with bar attachment. Materials and methods Sixteen completely edentulous healthy participants received new conventional dentures. In the mandible, four interforaminal implants were inserted. Following the stage of osseointegration, the bar was constructed in a trapezoidal configuration. Each patient randomly received the following overdentures using a crossover design: (1) conventional heat-cured acrylic resin overdenture and (2) 3D-printed overdenture (developed by scanning of mandibular conventional overdenture). The masticatory performance was assessed by conducting a two-colour mixing ability test at 5, 10, 20, 30, and 50 masticatory cycles. Moreover, the McGill Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire (MDSQ) was employed to assess patient satisfaction. Evaluation was performed after 3 months of using each overdenture. Paired sample t tests were used to compare the masticatory performance and MDSQ scores of patients for both prostheses. Results No significant difference in masticatory performance was reported between the two types of overdentures. Regarding patient satisfaction, only the esthetic aspect was significantly better for conventionally processed overdentures than for printed overdentures. Insignificant differences were observed regarding other MDSQ items between the two overdentures. Conclusion Within this clinical study, 3D-printed implant overdentures showed promising results in terms of chewing efficiency and patient satisfaction compared to conventionally fabricated implant overdentures. Trial registration Retrospectively registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06148727.(28/11/2023).

show abstract

3D-Printed Complete Dentures: A Review of Clinical and Patient-Based Outcomes

Abdelnabi,

Swelem

2024

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Biting Force and chewing efficiency of Conventional and CAD/CAM complete dentures. A Cross-over Study

Cited by 3 publications

References 48 publications

Assessing the Current Landscape and Future Directions of Digital Denture Technology

Assessing the Current Landscape and Future Directions of Digital Denture Technology

Evaluation of masticatory performance and patient satisfaction for conventional and 3D-printed implant overdentures: a randomized crossover study

3D-Printed Complete Dentures: A Review of Clinical and Patient-Based Outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About