2019
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2018.2856926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bivariate Gamma Distribution for Wavelength-Resolution SAR Change Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
102
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for a detection probability of 98%, our proposed change detection method presents log 10 (FAR) about −0.5, while [12,17,24] have log 10 (FAR) about 1.4, −0.3 and 0.14, respectively. For log 10 (FAR) = −0.9, i.e., a very low FAR, the probability detection given by [12] drops to 60%, while our proposal still maintains the probability of detection more than 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For example, for a detection probability of 98%, our proposed change detection method presents log 10 (FAR) about −0.5, while [12,17,24] have log 10 (FAR) about 1.4, −0.3 and 0.14, respectively. For log 10 (FAR) = −0.9, i.e., a very low FAR, the probability detection given by [12] drops to 60%, while our proposal still maintains the probability of detection more than 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The quantity P d was obtained from the ratio between the number of detected targets and the total numbers of known targets, while FAR is defined by the number of false alarms detected per square kilometer [26]. Figure 8 presents the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves [48] of the change detection results, showing the probability of detection versus the false alarm rates for the different evaluated values of C. We compared the change detection results obtained from the proposed method with the results described in [12,17,24]. The proposed method excels in terms of probability of detection and false alarm rate in comparison to [12,17,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations