Black Carbon as an Additional Indicator of the Adverse Health Effects of Airborne Particles Compared with PM ₁₀ and PM _2.5

Abstract

Background: Current air quality standards for particulate matter (PM) use the PM mass concentration [PM with aerodynamic diameters ≤ 10 μm (PM10) or ≤ 2.5 μm (PM2.5)] as a metric. It has been suggested that particles from combustion sources are more relevant to human health than are particles from other sources, but the impact of policies directed at reducing PM from combustion processes is usually relatively small when effects are estimated for a reduction in the total mass concentration.Objectives: We evaluated the value of black carbon particles (BCP) as an additional indicator in air quality management.Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of health effects of BCP compared with PM mass based on data from time-series studies and cohort studies that measured both exposures. We compared the potential health benefits of a hypothetical traffic abatement measure, using near-roadway concentration increments of BCP and PM2.5 based on data from prior studies.Results: Estimated health effects of a 1-μg/m3 increase in exposure were greater for BCP than for PM10 or PM2.5, but estimated effects of an interquartile range increase were similar. Two-pollutant models in time-series studies suggested that the effect of BCP was more robust than the effect of PM mass. The estimated increase in life expectancy associated with a hypothetical traffic abatement measure was four to nine times higher when expressed in BCP compared with an equivalent change in PM2.5 mass.Conclusion: BCP is a valuable additional air quality indicator to evaluate the health risks of air quality dominated by primary combustion particles.

Air pollution as a risk factor in health impact assessments of a travel mode shift towards cycling

“…The included studies used different methods, and their relation and conversion factors have been described previously [102]. All-cause mortality was significantly associated with elemental carbon, and the meta-analysis resulted in an RR of 1.061 per 1 μg/m 3 EC (95% CI 1.049–1.073).…”

The "dual-spot" Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation

“…Black carbon affects the optical properties of the atmosphere when suspended and is recognized as the second most important anthropogenic forcing agent for climate change after CO 2 (Ramanathan and Carmichael, 2008;Bond et al, 2013). Black carbon is also the leading indicator of the adverse health effects caused by particulate air pollution (Janssen et al, 2011(Janssen et al, , 2012Grahame et al, 2014). Reducing air pollution is a major societal need, which must be addressed at a local, national, regional and global scale.…”

Dome effect of black carbon and its key influencing factors: A one-dimensional modelling study

“…Featuring high light-absorbing 20 efficiency, BC would exert substantial impact on climate change at regional and even global scale (Bond et al, 2013;Menon et al, 2002;Ramanathan and Carmichael, 2008). Meanwhile, BC has been proven to be inextricably linked to short-term changes in public health such as cardiovascular mortality and cardiopulmonary hospital admissions (Eklund et al, 2014;Janssen et al, 2011). A recent study by has revealed the vital role of BC in enhancing near-surface haze pollution by the combined effects of heating by the light-absorbing BC aerosols in upper-PBL and the reduction of surface 25 heat flux, which substantially suppresses the development of PBL and consequently causes extreme haze pollution episode in China's megacities.…”