2021
DOI: 10.1080/17510694.2021.1939541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blockchain and publishing: towards a publisher-centred distributed ledger for the book publishing industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cluster 4, the discussion of BC 3.0 (Brilliantova and Thurner, 2019) on BMI intensity goes beyond the other two BC versions, BC 2.0 (Mukkamala et al, 2018) and 4.0 (Song and Lee, 2020). This situation was also identified in Cluster 5, where the discussion of BC 3.0 on the new value system (Ryan et al, 2021;Son-turan, 2022) significantly left behind other BC versions (Chang et al, 2019;Mercuri et al, 2021). For Cluster 6, the discussion of BC 3.0 on system logic (Tiscini et al, 2020) appears dominant compared to BC 2.0 and 4.0 (Mercuri et al, 2021).…”
Section: Ro1: Current Topics Of Bc Technology and Bmsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cluster 4, the discussion of BC 3.0 (Brilliantova and Thurner, 2019) on BMI intensity goes beyond the other two BC versions, BC 2.0 (Mukkamala et al, 2018) and 4.0 (Song and Lee, 2020). This situation was also identified in Cluster 5, where the discussion of BC 3.0 on the new value system (Ryan et al, 2021;Son-turan, 2022) significantly left behind other BC versions (Chang et al, 2019;Mercuri et al, 2021). For Cluster 6, the discussion of BC 3.0 on system logic (Tiscini et al, 2020) appears dominant compared to BC 2.0 and 4.0 (Mercuri et al, 2021).…”
Section: Ro1: Current Topics Of Bc Technology and Bmsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The literature on BCs and BMs can also be viewed using the type of BC and BM. Mukkamala et al (2018) and Ryan et al (2021) examined the intensity of BMI driven by the adoption of BC types. Using another theme, Hughes et al (2019) attempted to uncover the contributions of BC types to the value system and found a transaction cost reduction by adopting various BC types.…”
Section: The Coexistence Of Blockchain and Business Model (Innovation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymmetric encryption technology is first utilized to strengthen digital copyright defenses against forgery assaults [28]. Both public and private key encryption are available for use by digital libraries to manage digital copyrights: public key encryption can be used to add digital watermarks to copyrights with low security levels, enforce identity verification and access control, and lower the risk of malicious copyright forgeries; private key encryption can be used to grant the copyright owner the ability to independently set up copyright invocation methods and to completely prevent the use of phishing to steal copyright information [6,7]. Second, the security of digital copyright invocation is improved by the application of encryption and desensitization technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, the digital copyright transaction system that this study built has a welldefined hierarchical structure. The user layer, which is separated into three user categories-creators, administrators, and subscribers-offers service interfaces for managing users and copyright [5][6][7]. By using smart contracts to specify the data structure and operational features of the digital copyright trading system, the business model layer ensures the security and openness of the trading data.By building a decentralized communication network by connecting the middle layer and the underlying layer via the Connection Profile file, the Fabric network layer acts as the foundational infrastructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ryan et al (2020) as part of the 'no point in stopping' project, which aims to generate and sell new digital items based on a novella's draughts, revisions, and unpublished artwork. Furthermore, Ryan et al (2021) asserted that there is significant scholarly interest in how blockchain may be employed in the publishing industry. Furthermore, he argued that existing models are mostly untested and typically author-centered models of intellectual property and royalties administration, with little focus by researchers on publisher-centered models.…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%