2010
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Flow Changes Caused by Distal Filter Protection and Catheter Aspiration in the Internal Carotid Artery during Carotid Stenting: Evaluation Using Carotid Doppler Sonography

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:If blood flow in the ICA is reduced by the use of a distal filter during CAS, flow stagnation proximal to the filter occurs and this increases the probability of floating debris. The floating debris that remains after filter retrieval may cause cerebral embolism. However, if blood flow is increased by aspiration of blood from the ICA through an aspiration catheter, debris could be removed while the filter is still in place. The purpose of this study was to investigate blood flow changes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the absence of focal neurologic deficits in our patients is attributable to the CPD preventing embolic events by filtering small numbers of significantly large particles of embolic debris. Moreover, no instance of filter-related flow arrest occurred, probably because the percentage of obstructed pores was much lower than the reported values that cause slow-flow (50%) and noflow (88.5%) phenomena (Casserly et al, 2005;Roffi et al, 2008;Sorimachi et al, 2010Sorimachi et al, , 2011. Interestingly, we found debris larger than the size of pores even on the outer surface of the CPD.…”
Section: Figurecontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the absence of focal neurologic deficits in our patients is attributable to the CPD preventing embolic events by filtering small numbers of significantly large particles of embolic debris. Moreover, no instance of filter-related flow arrest occurred, probably because the percentage of obstructed pores was much lower than the reported values that cause slow-flow (50%) and noflow (88.5%) phenomena (Casserly et al, 2005;Roffi et al, 2008;Sorimachi et al, 2010Sorimachi et al, , 2011. Interestingly, we found debris larger than the size of pores even on the outer surface of the CPD.…”
Section: Figurecontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…. The blood flow velocity may be decreased after the deployment of a CPD and increased after its retrieval, even in patients with normal angiographic flow (Casserly et al, 2005;Roffi et al, 2008;Sorimachi et al, 2011). The flow impairment might be due to obstruction of the CPD pores, so reducing the total amount of embolic debris, such as by the aspiration of blood samples, may be a useful management intervention (Sorimachi et al, 2010).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After closure of the filter basket, an increase in blood flow causes a proportional increase in wall shear stress in the internal carotid artery, which probably releases fragments from vulnerable plaque and debris particles trapped between the stent struts and the arterial wall . This is one of the suspected mechanisms causing cerebral embolism after filter retrieval . Microembolization during CAS not only occurs during the filter protection [wall apposition and membrane pore size], but also a good number occurs before the filter is up , and some occurs after the procedure, with open and closed cell designs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadvertent occlusion of a carotid artery during stenting is a rare but catastrophic complication that can result in procedure-related stroke and requires an immediate rescue maneuver. The mechanisms underlying acute arterial occlusion can include embolic protection device (EPD)-related flow arrest, 1 arterial dissection, 2 vasospasm, 3,4 and the accordion effect. 5 The differential diagnosis can be challenging, but is crucial for appropriate management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%