2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762005000200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood transfusion and iatrogenic risks in Mexico city: anti-Trypanosoma cruzi seroprevalence in 43,048 blood donors, evaluation of parasitemia, and electrocardiogram findings in seropositive

Abstract: Iatrogenous transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi by blood transfusion was suggested as a potential risk by Pellegrino (1949

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although hemoculture always indicates the low sensitivity of such methods, a great deal of disagreement is found in its results when different studies are analyzed, which may be related to the nature of the culture medium, the technique employed, the volume of blood used or the number of test repetitions in each patient [46][47][48][49]. Concerning xenodiagnosis, the experiences of different authors also disagree, and that may be related to the different vector species used, the method of nymphs visualization and the amount of blood utilized [7,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although hemoculture always indicates the low sensitivity of such methods, a great deal of disagreement is found in its results when different studies are analyzed, which may be related to the nature of the culture medium, the technique employed, the volume of blood used or the number of test repetitions in each patient [46][47][48][49]. Concerning xenodiagnosis, the experiences of different authors also disagree, and that may be related to the different vector species used, the method of nymphs visualization and the amount of blood utilized [7,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood transfusion has been considered the second most important mode of transmission of Chagas disease in Mexico [68]. In 1998, the screening of almost 65,000 blood donors from 18 government-run transfusion centers showed a 1.5% prevalence of anti- T. cruzi antibodies in blood donors [69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to human infection, the National Seroepidemio-logical Survey (NSS) (Velasco et al 1992) carried out by the official Secretaría de Salud (SSa) showed a prevalence of 1.6%, whereas independent studies carried out mainly in rural areas have shown that between 20 and 30% of the population was infected by the pathogen (Monteon & Reyes-Lopez 1989, Tay et al 1992. Moreover, positive blood donors have been detected at percentages of 0.2-17% of infected persons (Ramos-Echevarria et al 1993, Guzman-Bracho et al 1998, Rangel et al 1998, Sánchez-Guillén et al 2002, Hernandez-Becerril et al 2005, Kirchhoff et al 2006). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%