1996
DOI: 10.1093/jac/38.6.1091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bolus or infusion teicoplanin for intravascular catheter associated infections in immunocompromised patients?

Abstract: An unexpected low efficacy of teicoplanin in the treatment of coagulase negative staphylococcal (CNS) infections on a regional Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) Unit led to a retrospective study. CNS infections treated with gylcopeptides in BMT patients with in-dwelling central venous lines between May 1990 and May 1995 were reviewed. Efficacy rates of 50% for teicoplanin compared with 80% for vancomycin despite comparable antibiotic susceptibility. Glycopeptides have bactericidal action which is time dependent. Te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 summarizes current recommendations based upon consensus and the literature, although the decision to salvage or remove a catheter should be made following discussion with the microbiologist and after consideration of the patient's clinical status and his position on the treatment pathway. Recent evidence suggests that in situ use of glycopeptides may be effective for coagulase negative staphylococcal infections (Ley et al. , 1996; Giacometti et al.…”
Section: Major Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 summarizes current recommendations based upon consensus and the literature, although the decision to salvage or remove a catheter should be made following discussion with the microbiologist and after consideration of the patient's clinical status and his position on the treatment pathway. Recent evidence suggests that in situ use of glycopeptides may be effective for coagulase negative staphylococcal infections (Ley et al. , 1996; Giacometti et al.…”
Section: Major Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows outpatient treatment for afebrile clinically stable patients. Considering the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships described above, it seems reasonable to extend the period of administration to several hours [144]. As an adjunct, antibiotic lock therapy can be added to the short infusion.…”
Section: G L Y C O P E P T I D E Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale, to increase the duration of exposure of organisms colonising the CVC to antibiotics, is based on evidence that bactericidal action is time dependent. 39 We did not conduct a systematic review of this option for two reasons. First, we found no relevant studies for slow infusion compared with bolus administration of antibiotics (see Figure 5).…”
Section: Antimicrobial Locks To Prevent Cvc-associated Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%