2006
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone formation after damaging in vivo fatigue loading results in recovery of whole‐bone monotonic strength and increased fatigue life

Abstract: Bone has a remarkable capacity for self-repair. We previously reported a woven bone response after damaging in vivo fatigue loading of the rat ulna that led to a rapid recovery of wholebone strength. In the current study we asked: does the bone response in the 12 days after damaging fatigue loading result in a bone that has normal fatigue properties? The right forelimbs of 52 adult rats were subjected to a single bout of in vivo fatigue loading. Nonloaded left forelimbs were used as controls. Ulnar geometric p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the intracortical remodeling activated by microdamage stimulus originates principally from periosteal and endocortical surfaces, it is possible that the differential response to the microdamage types observed may also be influenced by location of the damage type. The linear microdamage observed in this study was located mostly in the compressively-loaded regions of the ulnar diaphysis (44, 69, 70) nearer to the periosteal surfaces, while the diffuse damage characteristically occurred in tensile-loaded regions of the ulnar cortex and was distributed throughout the cortex. However, in previous canine (9, 51) fatigue studies, both linear microdamage and the associated intracortical remodeling activity were observed away from bone surfaces, indicating that it is unlikely that location of microdamage plays a major role in governing the remodeling response to the overuse stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the intracortical remodeling activated by microdamage stimulus originates principally from periosteal and endocortical surfaces, it is possible that the differential response to the microdamage types observed may also be influenced by location of the damage type. The linear microdamage observed in this study was located mostly in the compressively-loaded regions of the ulnar diaphysis (44, 69, 70) nearer to the periosteal surfaces, while the diffuse damage characteristically occurred in tensile-loaded regions of the ulnar cortex and was distributed throughout the cortex. However, in previous canine (9, 51) fatigue studies, both linear microdamage and the associated intracortical remodeling activity were observed away from bone surfaces, indicating that it is unlikely that location of microdamage plays a major role in governing the remodeling response to the overuse stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…However, because of the high fatigue levels examined in their study, the ulnae possessed both damage types, making it impossible to separate completely the effects of these two damage types. In the current studies we built on the recent observations from our laboratory and others showing that small-crack-type (i.e., diffuse) damage occurs earlier in bone's fatigue loading history than linear microcracks and also in different areas from linear microcracks (3, 7, 21-23, 69, 70, 75). Diffuse damage leads to changes in local material properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 In the current study, treatment with risedronate at high and low doses following stress fracture formation did not change the area or thickness of the woven bone. The woven bone in this model restores the mechanical properties of the ulna by 2 weeks after loading, 34,35 and this woven bone response was unaffected by risedronate treatment even at the high dose. Woven bone formation following rat ulnar loading was also unaffected by alendronate treatment given for 2 weeks prior to loading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This woven bone response is able to return the ulna to its original strength within 2 weeks of stress fracture creation in the rat ulna loading model. 35,42 It is therefore possible that woven bone callus is able to protect the site of the fracture and reduce any detrimental effects of a delay in stress fracture remodeling in clinical stress fracture cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, woven bone formation restores whole-bone mechanical strength within 12 days of loading, well before SFx healing is complete. 28,29 Mechanical testing would only reflect major changes in woven bone formation that are independent of the remodeling process along the fracture line. 15,16 Mechanical testing of whole bones is therefore not usually used to evaluate crack healing and remodeling along the SFx in this model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%