2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-8981(03)00081-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone remodeling markers in the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Corresponding to the pattern of the bone markers in Fig. 1, however, not only the formation markers PINP and BAP [89,142,143] are elevated due to osteoblastic metastases typical for prostate carcinoma, but also the classical resorption markers ICTP, TRAP5b, CTX, and NTX [89,140,[142][143][144][145].…”
Section: Bone Markers In Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Corresponding to the pattern of the bone markers in Fig. 1, however, not only the formation markers PINP and BAP [89,142,143] are elevated due to osteoblastic metastases typical for prostate carcinoma, but also the classical resorption markers ICTP, TRAP5b, CTX, and NTX [89,140,[142][143][144][145].…”
Section: Bone Markers In Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…PINP and ICTP are products of collagen metabolism, and their increased serum concentrations typically reflect pathologic bone turnover in cancer metastases to bone (38,(47)(48)(49)(50)(51). MIC-1 and PSA are derived from malignant cells (52,53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2. Demographic data of breast and prostate cancer patients stratified according to the severity of metastatic bone disease (i.e., Soloway score) Studies focusing on the use of aaCTX showed consistent elevation of the marker in prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis compared with healthy male controls (22) or cancer patient without bone metastasis (23). In contrast, only one study described significant elevation in hhCTX in male lung cancer patients with bone metastasis (9), but in light of our negative findings, it remains to be established whether this biomarker is a selective indicator of lung metastasis in bones of males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%