2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-020-01529-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bone scintigraphy as a gatekeeper for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: comparison with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT is superior to a bone scan for staging/restaging prostate cancer patients as it is has a higher sensitivity for the detection of bone metastases as well as it is able to detect extraosseous metastases. According to a study carried out by Caglar et al, [ 20 ] they demonstrated that 75% and 98.2% of patients with bone metastases were correctly diagnosed by bone scintigraphy and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT, respectively. It was noted that although Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT has better image resolution and diagnostic confidence than bone scintigraphy, it does comes at a higher cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT is superior to a bone scan for staging/restaging prostate cancer patients as it is has a higher sensitivity for the detection of bone metastases as well as it is able to detect extraosseous metastases. According to a study carried out by Caglar et al, [ 20 ] they demonstrated that 75% and 98.2% of patients with bone metastases were correctly diagnosed by bone scintigraphy and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT, respectively. It was noted that although Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT has better image resolution and diagnostic confidence than bone scintigraphy, it does comes at a higher cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noted that although Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT has better image resolution and diagnostic confidence than bone scintigraphy, it does comes at a higher cost. [ 20 ] Due to the cost of the camera and the radiopharmaceutical being high, Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT is therefore still not widely available and only limited to a few centers in South Africa and many low income countries, thus many centers still rely on a bone scan as part of the staging/restaging work-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ergänzende empfohlene diagnostische Methoden sind eine dünnschichtige kraniale Computertomographie (CCT) und eine Knochenszintigraphie, deren Sensitivität teilweise allerdings für osteolytische Läsionen eingeschränkt ist [ 13 ], und eine Positronenemissionstomographie-CT (PET-CT; [ 9 ]), deren Auflösung im Bereich der Schädelbasis in Anbetracht der Glukoseaufnahme des Hirns jedoch ebenfalls limitiert ist. Beim Prostatakarzinom bietet ein prostataspezifisches Membran-Antigen-PET-CT (PSMA-PET-CT) eine hohe Sensitivität [ 1 , 14 ].…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified
“…Moreover, both CT and MR present low sensibility in distinguishing metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes as the only discrimination criteria is based on their size and morphology [ 4 , 7 ]. As for M-staging, BS outperforms CT in detecting skeletal spread of PCa but has a limited detection rate in the case of small lesions and lacks specificity, leading to some doubtful results [ 8 , 9 ]. Therefore, in recent years, positron emission tomography (PET) associated with CT or MRI (PET/CT or PET/MRI) has been increasingly utilized in PCa staging [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%