2012
DOI: 10.7763/ijtef.2012.v3.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Book Building Process: A Mechanism for Efficient Pricing in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding of this study is consistent with the findings of Narasimhan and Ramana (1995), Madhusoodanan and Thiripalraju (1997), Karmakar (2002), Chaturvedi et al (2006), Sehgal and Singh (2007), and Garg et al (2008). Bora et al (2012) reported that Indian IPOs are underpriced when measured using offer price and the opening price on listing day (which is again consistent with our measure using the same prices). Also, Cheung and Krinsky (1994) and Cheng et al (2004) documented underpricing using similar measure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding of this study is consistent with the findings of Narasimhan and Ramana (1995), Madhusoodanan and Thiripalraju (1997), Karmakar (2002), Chaturvedi et al (2006), Sehgal and Singh (2007), and Garg et al (2008). Bora et al (2012) reported that Indian IPOs are underpriced when measured using offer price and the opening price on listing day (which is again consistent with our measure using the same prices). Also, Cheung and Krinsky (1994) and Cheng et al (2004) documented underpricing using similar measure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Garg, Arora, and Singla (2008) also documented that Indian IPOs are significantly underpriced and noted that the level of underpricing does not vary much in the hot and cold IPO market. Studying book-built and fixed-price IPOs in India, Bora, Adhikary, and Jha (2012) found underpricing of 21.42% for fixed-price IPOs and 18.22% for book-built IPOs. However, when adjusted for market movement, the corresponding figures are 16.71 and 16.75, respectively.…”
Section: Listing Day Underpricingmentioning
confidence: 99%