Books (Are Not Like People): A Postdigital Fable

Abstract

What are books? In 2054, where reading and writing have been banned, a scholar in a dystopian academy known as University V might legitimately pose such a question. This article uses speculative fiction as a form of narrative enquiry to explore the socio-materiality of the iconic educational artefact of the textbook. It gives an empirical account of socio-material practices of textbook use (and non-use) gathered from a series of interviews with online distance education students. We analyse these interviews via speculative fiction. We engage in a sense-making activity of the student testimony by narrating their story, via a scholar looking back at our times from a post-literature future. We seek to contribute to a relative dearth of future studies that use real student data. We give an example of how speculative fiction may be used as a form of research method to analyse and interpret such data. In so doing, we seek to cast a light on current educational practices, to show how books and people are entangled. As people, objects and spaces of education intertwine, they call our attention to the interplay of form and function. They decentre the human actor. We attempt to show how form legitimates certain types of knowledge, certain people, indeed people themselves from other non-human actors. We conclude that knowledge is not disembodied, is not stable and is not locked up in books. In our final analysis, we conclude what may seem obviously true, that books are not like people.

Information and Media Literacy in the Age of AI: Options for the Future

“…The emergence of ChatGPT has brought on a frenzy of educational research and media attention, much of which is focused on the impact tools such as ChatGPT may have on academic assessment, academic integrity, and teaching and learning more generally. Setting aside these recent hyperbolic [4] discussions, it is important to consider the many practical ways in which AI is impacting how our students and wider society access, evaluate, and consume information and media.…”

Impossible Dreaming: On Speculative Education Fiction and Hopeful Learning Futures

“…These stories might come in many forms (let your imagination run wild, let your heart rewild (Costello et al 2022 ): stories that do not just highlight injustice but also consider and entertain the beauty and messiness of healing and transformative justice (Dixon and Piepzna-Samarasinha 2020 ); stories that slow us down and offer what Bayo Akomolafe ( 2020 ) calls sanctuary; stories that invite us to better understand the relationship between praise and grief (Prechtel 2015 ); stories that enable us to recognize ourselves and each other and to bear witness even when we cannot recognize ourselves and each other; stories that are so powerful they change us and thus change culture. If speculative education fiction and critical education research more generally has anything to offer to the worlds of what might be, let it be this.…”