2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
374
0
26

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 658 publications
(405 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
374
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…To create intervals of confidence and t-values, we used bootstrapping (4000 re samples) to check for imagined associations between the concerned constructs of the planned structured model. Streukens, S., et al [82] stated that bootstrap replications can vary considerably from a minimum of 500 to a maximum of 5000.In other words, statistic inconsistency is checked using the inconsistency of data using bootstrapping, which is a nonparametric resampling method, instead of using parametric statements to check the accuracy of approximation [83]. Efron, B., et al [84] proposed using more than 1000 bootstrap samples.…”
Section: Structured Model Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create intervals of confidence and t-values, we used bootstrapping (4000 re samples) to check for imagined associations between the concerned constructs of the planned structured model. Streukens, S., et al [82] stated that bootstrap replications can vary considerably from a minimum of 500 to a maximum of 5000.In other words, statistic inconsistency is checked using the inconsistency of data using bootstrapping, which is a nonparametric resampling method, instead of using parametric statements to check the accuracy of approximation [83]. Efron, B., et al [84] proposed using more than 1000 bootstrap samples.…”
Section: Structured Model Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess discriminant validity, according to Fornell and Larcker [79], we calculated the average variance extracted (AVE) for all of the constructs that obtained values higher than the limit of 0.50. To test the hypotheses, we used the nonparametric bootstrap resampling technique [80], which provides values for both the standard error and Student's t-test. In particular, in order to calculate the path coefficient's significance, we applied this technique to 500 sub-samples using a two-tailed Student's t distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom, where n is the number of sub-samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following section, we present the results of the PLS modeling, considering that we followed strict recommendations in order to guarantee the rigor and the richness of the description of data analysis (Chin, 2010;Peng & Lai, 2012;Richter et al, 2016;Streukens & Leroi-Werelds, 2016 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimation is gathered through a resampling procedure that assesses the variability within sample data (Peng & Lai, 2012;Streukens & Leroi-Werelds, 2016). For our model, we adopted a consistent number of bootstrap samples (J=10,000) for improving the level of accuracy of the estimations (Streukens & Leroi-Werelds, 2016).…”
Section: Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation