Borderline personality disorder and its facets in the context of personality metatraits and pathological traits

Brud, Piotr Paweł; Cieciuch, Jan

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111958

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous research shows that BPD is characterized by considerable heterogeneity (Brud, 2021). For instance, Brud and Cieciuch (2023) BPD is characterized by high emotional sensitivity (reflected by high harm avoidance; e.g., Joyce et al, 2003), and since prior research suggests that it may have different personality backgrounds (i.e., internalizing and externalizing; e.g., Eaton et al, 2011), it is presumable that BPD may also have different levels and mobilization of endogenous drive.…”

Section: Current Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, our second hypothesis is that general borderline factors will be explained mainly by the positive pole of the Reactivity dimension (i.e., by the Sensitivity trait and its facets), and to a lesser degree by the positive pole of the Activity dimension (i.e., Dynamism and its facets). In addition, given the nature of internalization (i.e., withdrawal, anxiety, uncertainty, affect dysregulation, and depressiveness; Brud & Cieciuch, 2023) and externalization, which relates more to dysregulated behavior, autonomy, or opposition (Eaton et al, 2011), we pose a third hypothesis that BIF will be explained by the positive pole of the Reactivity dimension (i.e., Sensitivity trait and its facets), while BEF will be explained by the positive pole of the Activity dimension (i.e., Dynamism and its facets).…”

Section: Current Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The mean number of previous hospital admissions including the current stay was 3.11 (SD = 2.59). Data from this study were also used by Brud and Cieciuch (2023) to examine a separate research question.…”

Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Accordingly, people with BPD often report the following symptoms: dynamically changing emotions, irritability, anxiety, difficulty controlling anger, sensitivity to rejection, a shaky self-image, a sense of emptiness, paranoid thoughts during times of severe stress, difficulties in defining sexual preferences, self-harm, or suicide attempts (Gunderson et al, 2018;Lieb et al, 2004). In addition, BPD shows a high level of comorbidity with a number of other psychiatric disorders, especially at the level of internalizing (e.g., anxious, fragility, despondence, and avoidance) and externalizing dimensions (e.g., dysregulated anger, antisocial, autonomous, and manipulativeness; Brud, 2021;Brud & Cieciuch, 2023;Eaton et al, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various personality variables, such as personality metatraits or pathological traits, are used to describe or predict BPD (Brud & Cieciuch, 2023;Oltmanns & Widiger, 2019;Stricker & Pietrowsky, 2022). Among them, temperament is of special importance as it is claimed to be the basis for personality (Barnow et al, 2007;Strelau, 2004).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Temperamental underpinnings of borderline personality disorder and its facets

Brud,

Cieciuch

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Temperament is claimed to be the basis for personality; therefore, discovering the temperamental underpinnings of borderline personality disorder and its facets is crucial for understanding this personality disorder. In this article, we explore these underpinnings by using a new model of temperament, based on the Regulative Theory of Temperament, the Big Two of temperament, and the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Two studies were conducted on adults – the first was in a general population sample (N = 315) and the second was in a clinical sample (N = 113) in people with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder. The following measurements were used: The Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (SI-Bord), the Five‑Factor Borderline Inventory – Short Form (FFBI-SF), and the Temperament Metadimensions Questionnaire (TMQ). General borderline was explained by Reactivity (high Sensitivity) and Activity (high Dynamism). At the facet level, the Borderline Internalizing Facet was mainly explained by Reactivity (high Sensitivity), while the Borderline Externalizing Facet was explained by Activity (high Dynamism) in addition to Reactivity (high Sensitivity). The results of our study revealed specific temperamental underpinnings of borderline and its facets. Reactivity underlies all borderline facets, while Activity differentiates between the Borderline Externalizing Facet and Borderline Internalizing Facet.

show abstract

Section: Current Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Current Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Temperamental underpinnings of borderline personality disorder and its facets

Brud,

Cieciuch

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Temperamental underpinnings of borderline personality disorder and its facets

Brud,

Cieciuch

2024

Personality & Mental Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Temperament is claimed to be the basis for personality; therefore, discovering the temperamental underpinnings of borderline personality disorder and its facets is crucial for understanding this personality disorder. In this article, we explore these underpinnings by using a new model of temperament, based on the Regulative Theory of Temperament, the Big Two of temperament, and the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Two studies were conducted on adults—the first was in a general population sample (N = 315) and the second was in a clinical sample (N = 113) in people with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder. The following measurements were used: The Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (SI‐Bord), the Five‐Factor Borderline Inventory‐Short Form (FFBI‐SF), and the Temperament Metadimensions Questionnaire (TMQ). General borderline was explained by Reactivity (high Sensitivity) and Activity (high Dynamism). At the facet level, the Borderline Internalizing Facet was mainly explained by Reactivity (high Sensitivity), while the Borderline Externalizing Facet was explained by Activity (high Dynamism) in addition to Reactivity (high Sensitivity). The results of our study revealed specific temperamental underpinnings of borderline and its facets. Reactivity underlies all borderline facets, while Activity differentiates between the Borderline Externalizing Facet and Borderline Internalizing Facet.

show abstract

Internal consistency of measures for ICD‐11 personality disorder severity and traits: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Hualparuca‐Olivera,

Caycho‐Rodríguez,

Torales

et al. 2024

Personality & Mental Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A number of measures and scales have been developed for the ICD‐11 personality disorder (PD) diagnosis, including severity and trait dimensions. The present systematic review and meta‐analysis sought to evaluate the internal consistency of these measures across different populations and cultures. A systematic search was conducted across four databases where relevant studies were subjected to explicit eligibility criteria resulting in 49 included studies and 370 effect sizes. Study characteristics were tabulated, their methodological quality was evaluated, and findings were synthesized using random effects meta‐analysis. Findings overall indicated that measures of ICD‐11 PD severity and trait domains have adequate levels of internal consistency (α/ω = 0.82, 95% CI [0.81; 0.83], I2 = 97.3%). Aspects such as sample, country, language, format, and measured construct were significant sources of variation. Additional meta‐analyses revealed that some measures performed better than others for certain dimensions. Internal consistency was overall supported across ICD‐11 measures of severity and trait domains. Future research should further investigate the interrater reliability, test–retest reliability and stability, and alignment with interview‐based PD diagnoses.

show abstract

Borderline personality disorder and its facets in the context of personality metatraits and pathological traits

Cited by 7 publications

References 43 publications

Temperamental underpinnings of borderline personality disorder and its facets

Temperamental underpinnings of borderline personality disorder and its facets

Temperamental underpinnings of borderline personality disorder and its facets

Internal consistency of measures for ICD‐11 personality disorder severity and traits: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About