2010
DOI: 10.1038/nature09492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment

Abstract: A; et al., (2010). Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature, (468) Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment Abstract Biodiversity is rapidly declining1, and this may negatively affect ecosystem processes, including economically important ecosystem services. Previous studies have shown that biodiversity has positive effects on organisms and processes4 across trophic levels. However, only a few stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

63
872
11
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 850 publications
(954 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
63
872
11
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The shape of a diversity-function relationship has important implications both for the mechanisms underlying diversity effects and the consequences of diversity loss for functioning 33 . We therefore fitted a series of linear and non-linear models to the biomass data (Table 3), similar to those used in other analyses 33,34 : a linear model, which implies equal functional effects and no redundancy among epigenotypes, two saturating models (Michaelis-Menten and asymptotic exponential), which would suggest some redundancy, a quadratic model, which would indicate an optimum level of epigenetic diversity and an exponential model, which would imply strong positive interactions among epiRILs and rapid loss of function if diversity is reduced. We also modelled diversity as a categorical variable, which would suggest differences between diversity levels but no clear increase in function with increasing diversity, and in addition we fitted two contrasts, to determine if the diversity effect was due to a particular diversity level differing from all the others: monocultures versus all other diversity levels and the highest diversity level (16 epiRILs) versus all other levels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape of a diversity-function relationship has important implications both for the mechanisms underlying diversity effects and the consequences of diversity loss for functioning 33 . We therefore fitted a series of linear and non-linear models to the biomass data (Table 3), similar to those used in other analyses 33,34 : a linear model, which implies equal functional effects and no redundancy among epigenotypes, two saturating models (Michaelis-Menten and asymptotic exponential), which would suggest some redundancy, a quadratic model, which would indicate an optimum level of epigenetic diversity and an exponential model, which would imply strong positive interactions among epiRILs and rapid loss of function if diversity is reduced. We also modelled diversity as a categorical variable, which would suggest differences between diversity levels but no clear increase in function with increasing diversity, and in addition we fitted two contrasts, to determine if the diversity effect was due to a particular diversity level differing from all the others: monocultures versus all other diversity levels and the highest diversity level (16 epiRILs) versus all other levels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of plant diversity may thus be expected 456 to become weaker higher up in food webs (Scherber et al 2010). However, several recent 457 studies have shown that predator abundance can strongly increase with plant diversity and 458 particularly also with plant phylogenetic diversity (e. (Root 1973;Haddad et al 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the strength of bottom‐up effects depends on the trophic level of the consumers, with only weak direct effects on omnivores (Scherber et al. 2010). Moreover, the relation of consumer diversity and resource exploitation applies to specialized consumers (Finke and Snyder 2008) and high consumer densities (Griffin et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%