2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of hemifacial spasm over 16years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results reported here are supported by Sorgun et al, reporting on a meta-analysis of BT therapy for HFS. 70 They found that 94.3% of patients experienced an 86.7% improvement in symptoms, adverse events occurred in 2.3%-22.1% of injections, and the average duration of therapy was 15.7 weeks. Although BT injections boast a very high response rate, Hsiung et al reported primary and secondary resistance rates of 2.9% and 4.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Comparative Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results reported here are supported by Sorgun et al, reporting on a meta-analysis of BT therapy for HFS. 70 They found that 94.3% of patients experienced an 86.7% improvement in symptoms, adverse events occurred in 2.3%-22.1% of injections, and the average duration of therapy was 15.7 weeks. Although BT injections boast a very high response rate, Hsiung et al reported primary and secondary resistance rates of 2.9% and 4.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Comparative Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The percent of injections resulting in an adverse reaction was 16% (95% CI 8-25, p < 0.001, I 2 0.83). 4,36,66,70,73 All report-ed complications were transient. The most commonly reported complications included ptosis, diplopia, and facial weakness.…”
Section: Treatment Of Hfs With Btmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Defazio et al found that the percentage of side effects was be related to dosage. Cakmur et al reported higher success rates, longer durations of improvement, and fewer side effects with pretarsal injections [4,9,11,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IncoBoNT-A and onaBoNT-A are typically diluted to a concentration of 5 U/0.1 cc; aboBoNT-A to 20 U/0.1 cc. 22,39,79 A single study comparing dilutions of 5 U/0.1 cc and 2.5 U/0.1 cc onaBoNT-A for HFS showed a longer duration for the more concentrated injectate, but more pronounced and longer lasting weakness. 80…”
Section: Doses/toxin Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%