2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary object efficacy: The mediating role of boundary objects on task conflict in global virtual project networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(92 reference statements)
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e n v i r o n m e n t a l s c i e n c e & p o l i c y x x x ( 2 0 1 5 ) x x x -x x x and the constraints of the several parties employing them, yet robust enough to maintain a common identity across sites'' (Star and Griesemer, 1989, p. 393). Boundary objects have been used in many studies analysing co-operation between actors from different social worlds (Iorio and Taylor, 2014;Mattor et al, 2014;Star and Griesemer, 1989;Star, 2010;Swart and Van der Windt, 2012;Turnhout, 2009). For the assessment of significant effect, actors from research institutes, governmental departments and nature organisations, with different perspectives and daily activities all contributed their interpretation of what significance means.…”
Section: Significant Effect As Boundary Objectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e n v i r o n m e n t a l s c i e n c e & p o l i c y x x x ( 2 0 1 5 ) x x x -x x x and the constraints of the several parties employing them, yet robust enough to maintain a common identity across sites'' (Star and Griesemer, 1989, p. 393). Boundary objects have been used in many studies analysing co-operation between actors from different social worlds (Iorio and Taylor, 2014;Mattor et al, 2014;Star and Griesemer, 1989;Star, 2010;Swart and Van der Windt, 2012;Turnhout, 2009). For the assessment of significant effect, actors from research institutes, governmental departments and nature organisations, with different perspectives and daily activities all contributed their interpretation of what significance means.…”
Section: Significant Effect As Boundary Objectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies (Benn et al, 2013;Iorio &Taylor, 2014) underline the intuitive and interpretative processes in distributed sensemaking. We also acknowledge the role of emotions in sensemaking and, in particular, individual emotions enacted as a 'boundary object and spanning process-resources' in bureaucratic knowledge work revealed in this study.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Their boundary nature is reflected by the fact that they are simultaneously concrete and abstract, specific and general, conventionalized and customized" (Star & Griesemer, 1989). Boundary objects have been examined in various contexts within different types of projects (Iorio & Taylor, 2014), such as in the study of virtual projects (Iorio & Taylor, 2014) and participatory IT process design (Rasmussen et al, 2013). Moreover, boundary objects can also exhibit specific properties such as being "conflict process mediators" (Iorio & Taylor, 2014).…”
Section: Non-it and It Artifacts As Boundary Objects: Collaboration Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boundary objects have been examined in various contexts within different types of projects (Iorio & Taylor, 2014), such as in the study of virtual projects (Iorio & Taylor, 2014) and participatory IT process design (Rasmussen et al, 2013). Moreover, boundary objects can also exhibit specific properties such as being "conflict process mediators" (Iorio & Taylor, 2014). Boundary objects can be intermediary and final artifacts produced during or as an outcome of the research process.…”
Section: Non-it and It Artifacts As Boundary Objects: Collaboration Fmentioning
confidence: 99%