2016
DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Objects as Part of Knowledge Integration for Networked Innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Verona and Ravasi (2003) believe that KI is the internal basis allowing enterprises to improve their SDA. First, KI not only improves the utilization rate of knowledge and reduces knowledge redundancy in the process of product and service provision but also further promotes the generation of new knowledge (Maenpaa et al ., 2016) through member creativity and brings continuous innovation abilities to enterprises. Additionally, the process of KI deepens the level of understanding and close communication of knowledge among the internal members of an enterprise and enhances the efficient cooperation between them (Zahra et al ., 2000).…”
Section: Theoretical Development and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Verona and Ravasi (2003) believe that KI is the internal basis allowing enterprises to improve their SDA. First, KI not only improves the utilization rate of knowledge and reduces knowledge redundancy in the process of product and service provision but also further promotes the generation of new knowledge (Maenpaa et al ., 2016) through member creativity and brings continuous innovation abilities to enterprises. Additionally, the process of KI deepens the level of understanding and close communication of knowledge among the internal members of an enterprise and enhances the efficient cooperation between them (Zahra et al ., 2000).…”
Section: Theoretical Development and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They first implement a network setting-up phase by frequently participating in fairs to gain inspiration and identify complementary partners (Van Egeraat et al 2013). Then, the development stage requires intensive exchanges within the network, for instance using boundary objects to facilitate the joint integration of knowledge for innovation development and commercialization (Mäenpää et al 2016).…”
Section: Collaborative Innovation Network For Smesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responding to such opportunities and challenges, a geographically dispersed, cross-disciplinary team, composed of chemists, engineers, and designers, is working towards developing bio-based 3D/4D materials and equipment in New Zealand (Zeidler et al, 2018). To confirm that this new technology is attuned to market demands (Edwards, 2005;Mäenpää et al, 2016) the team has built-in regular engagement with industry.…”
Section: The Sfti National Challengementioning
confidence: 99%