2000
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.1.86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bovine and Human Insulin Activate CD8+-Autoreactive CTL Expressing Both Type 1 and Type 2 Cytokines in C57BL/6 Mice

Abstract: CD8+ T cells down-regulate a variety of immune responses. For example, porcine and human insulin do not stimulate Abs in C57BL/6 mice because CD8+ T cells inhibit CD4+ helper T cells. By contrast, bovine insulin induces Ab in C57BL/6 mice, and removal of CD8+ T cells does not alter this response. This raises the question of whether porcine, but not bovine, insulin activates CD8+ T cells or whether both insulins activate CD8+ T cells but CD4+ helper T cells are differentially inhibited by them. In this study, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mice on a B6 genetic background do not normally display any spontaneous anti-insulin T cell reactivity, nor do they develop anti-insulin autoantibodies. Although mice on a B6 background do not normally develop diabetes, they are able to respond to insulin after immunization (37,38), indicating the presence of precursors, which under these circumstances could be stimulated to become pathogenic. However, even under the experimental conditions shown in this study, these mice do not produce insulin autoantibodies (data not shown).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice on a B6 genetic background do not normally display any spontaneous anti-insulin T cell reactivity, nor do they develop anti-insulin autoantibodies. Although mice on a B6 background do not normally develop diabetes, they are able to respond to insulin after immunization (37,38), indicating the presence of precursors, which under these circumstances could be stimulated to become pathogenic. However, even under the experimental conditions shown in this study, these mice do not produce insulin autoantibodies (data not shown).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such CTL generated are specifically lytic toward their corresponding target cells. However, no CTL were detected without in vivo Ag priming (14,15,17), after priming with soluble protein, or protein in IFA (30) Although OVA-specific and insulin-specific CD8 ϩ lines are cytolytic, they secreted different cytokines upon stimulation. OVA-CTL produced significant amounts of IFN-␥ and TNF-␣ but no IL-4, IL-5, or IL-10, which represents a Tc1 cytokine profile (Fig.…”
Section: Phenotypic and Functional Differences Between Ova-ctl And Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we reported that CTL specific for exogenous proteins were primed in C57BL/6 (B6) mice by OVA (14) or bovine insulin (BINS) (15) in CFA. No CTL were elicited in mice primed with soluble proteins or proteins emulsified in IFA (14).…”
Section: A Lthough Virus-and Alloantigen-specific Cd8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infiltration of the eye by immunosuppressive CD11b ϩ myeloid cells may play a role in preventing immune elimination of E.G7-OVA by CD8 ϩ CTL. (27) were grown in standard growth medium (SGM) (RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 M 2-ME, gentamicin, penicillin, and streptomycin) at 37°C in a 5% CO 2 atmosphere. All cell lines were maintained free of mycoplasma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%