2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jctb.2007.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boxicity and maximum degree

Abstract: A d-dimensional box is a Cartesian product of d closed intervals on the real line. The boxicity of a graph is the minimum dimension d such that it is representable as the intersection graph of d-dimensional boxes. We give a short constructive proof that every graph with maximum degree D has boxicity at most 2D 2 . We also conjecture that the best upper bound is linear in D.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Roberts, in his seminal work [24] proved that the boxicity of a complete k-partite graph is k. Chandran and Sivadasan [6] showed that box(G) ≤ tree-width (G) + 2. Chandran, Francis and Sivadasan [5] proved that box(G) ≤ χ(G 2 ) where, χ(G 2 ) is the chromatic number of G 2 . In [14] Esperet proved that box(G) ≤ ∆ 2 (G) + 2, where ∆(G) is the maximum degree of G. Scheinerman [25] showed that the boxicity of outer planar graphs is at most 2.…”
Section: Boxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Roberts, in his seminal work [24] proved that the boxicity of a complete k-partite graph is k. Chandran and Sivadasan [6] showed that box(G) ≤ tree-width (G) + 2. Chandran, Francis and Sivadasan [5] proved that box(G) ≤ χ(G 2 ) where, χ(G 2 ) is the chromatic number of G 2 . In [14] Esperet proved that box(G) ≤ ∆ 2 (G) + 2, where ∆(G) is the maximum degree of G. Scheinerman [25] showed that the boxicity of outer planar graphs is at most 2.…”
Section: Boxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Counter examples to the conjecture of [5]: Chandran et al [5] conjectured that boxicity of a graph is O(∆). We use a result by Erdős, Kierstead and Trotter [13] to show that there exist graphs with boxicity Ω(∆ log ∆), hence disproving the conjecture.…”
Section: Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was later strengthened by Yannakakis [6], and finally by Kratochvil [8] who showed that deciding whether boxicity of a graph is at most two itself is NP-complete. Recently Chandran et al [17] showed that for any graph G, box(G) ≤ χ(G 2 ) where G 2 is the square of graph G and χ is the chromatic number of a graph. From this they inferred that box(G) ≤ 2∆ 2 + 2, where ∆ is the maximum degree of G. Very recently this result was improved by Esperet [18], who showed that box(G) ≤ ∆ 2 + 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent work has shown that graphs which are embeddable on a torus have boxicity at most 7, while graphs embeddable on a surface of genus g have boxicity at most 5g + 3 [28]. Boxicity has been bounded in terms of parameters such as treewidth [16] and maximum degree [1,13,27]. Boxicity of various other graph classes have also been studied [6,7,12,21], where in particular it was shown in [12] that there exist chordal graphs with arbitrarily high boxicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%