2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain event-related potentials predict individual differences in inhibitory control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research should also consider using alternative methods such as techniques involving machine learning methods (Pereira et al, 2009). The utilization of machine learning methods in ERP research is still rare (Rueda-Delgado et al, 2019), but it could provide valuable information in future studies tackling the relationship between neural activity and CB (e.g., Hakim et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research should also consider using alternative methods such as techniques involving machine learning methods (Pereira et al, 2009). The utilization of machine learning methods in ERP research is still rare (Rueda-Delgado et al, 2019), but it could provide valuable information in future studies tackling the relationship between neural activity and CB (e.g., Hakim et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process was repeated for each participant. Further, internal validation sets (inner cross-validation) were performed to choose the hyperparameters of the model 64 . Thus, the same hyperparameters were selected in the external validation sets 65 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants provided written informed consent. The raw data from this dataset formed the basis of another study that did not focus on spectral properties (Rueda-Delgado et al, 2019). The inclusion and exclusion criteria of each project are available in the Supplementary Material in Rueda-Delgado et al (2019).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were calculated and datasets with z-scores > 3 were excluded from further analysis. Fifteen participants were rejected from further analysis due to these artefacts or noisy data (in accordance with the exclusion criteria in Rueda-Delgado et al, 2019). The remaining 220 participants were subjected to further analysis.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%