2020
DOI: 10.1177/1352458520964415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain structural and functional alterations in MOG antibody disease

Abstract: Background: The impact of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) on brain structure and function is unknown. Objectives: The aim of this study was to study the multimodal brain MRI alterations in MOGAD and to investigate their clinical significance. Methods: A total of 17 MOGAD, 20 aquaporin-4 antibody seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (AQP4 + NMOSD), and 28 healthy controls (HC) were prospectively recruited. Voxel-wise gray matter (GM) volume, fractional anisotropy (FA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Severe functional impairment in the visual areas and increased FC in the temporal gyrus were also detected in MOGAD (55), which indicates the presence of functional plasticity trying to compensate for the structural damage, as previously demonstrated in MS and NMOSD (112).…”
Section: Advanced Mri Techniques Assessing Functional Changessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Severe functional impairment in the visual areas and increased FC in the temporal gyrus were also detected in MOGAD (55), which indicates the presence of functional plasticity trying to compensate for the structural damage, as previously demonstrated in MS and NMOSD (112).…”
Section: Advanced Mri Techniques Assessing Functional Changessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…MOGAD patients present great differences in brain MR [4][5] , and no highly speci c radiological features has been identi ed to differentiate MOGAD from non-MOG antibody cases. Study found more than half of the patients had no evident lesions in brain routine MR [6] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protocols of FLAIR images were as follows: 3D sagittal acquisition by inversion recovery turbo spin echo (IR-TSE), time of repetition (TR)/ time of echo (TE) = 4800 ms/228 ms, inversion recovery = 1650 ms, flip angle = 90°, voxel size = 1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm, matrix size = 256 × 256, slice number = 196. DTI protocols were as follows: 2D axial acquisition by spin echo-echo planar imaging, TR/TE = 4,000 ms/88 ms, FA = 90°, voxel size = 2.5 mm × 2.5 mm, slice thickness = 2.5 mm, slice gap = 0.25 mm, matrix = 96 × 96, slice number = 60, b values = 0 and 1000 s/mm 2 , diffusion gradient direction = 48 ( 17 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The white matter hyperintensity lesions on FLAIR were manually segmented by two experienced neuroradiologists (authors TZ and YD) using 3D Slicer software ( https://www.slicer.org/ ). The 3D T1 image was lesion-filled at the average intensity of surrounding white matter of normal appearance using the Lesion Segmentation Tool for SPM (version 3.0.0, https://www.applied-statistics.de/lst.html ) ( 17 ). Segmentation of lesion-filled 3D T1 images was conducted using the Computational Anatomy Toolbox in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM, version 12 https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/ ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%