2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-008-0860-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain structural damage in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1

Abstract: VBM confirms that atrophy predominantly involves the brainstem and cerebellum in SCA1. The correlation with the clinical features indicates that VBM might be useful to monitor disease progression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the findings of Brenneis et al (2003), Della Nave et al (2004, 2008a,b), Ginestroni et al (2008) and Ying et al (2006), the correlation calculated in this work between cerebellar GM volume and ataxia score was not found to be significant, most probably due to the small size of our cohort. However, other studies also failed to find significant correlations with cerebellar GM volume (Prakash et al, 2009;Akhlaghi et al, 2011) and found the ataxia score to be correlated with other metrics related to the cerebellar peduncles -dMRI metrics (Prakash et al, 2009) and volume metrics (Akhlaghi et al, 2011).…”
Section: White Matter Damage and Clinical Scorecontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to the findings of Brenneis et al (2003), Della Nave et al (2004, 2008a,b), Ginestroni et al (2008) and Ying et al (2006), the correlation calculated in this work between cerebellar GM volume and ataxia score was not found to be significant, most probably due to the small size of our cohort. However, other studies also failed to find significant correlations with cerebellar GM volume (Prakash et al, 2009;Akhlaghi et al, 2011) and found the ataxia score to be correlated with other metrics related to the cerebellar peduncles -dMRI metrics (Prakash et al, 2009) and volume metrics (Akhlaghi et al, 2011).…”
Section: White Matter Damage and Clinical Scorecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the MCP, Ginestroni et al (2008) andDella Nave et al (2008b), in both cases using VBM, demonstrated reduced volumes in patients (in an SCA1 and SCA2 cohort respectively), while Burk et al (1996) showed reduced total volume in SCA1, SCA2 and SCA3 patients. Guerrini et al (2004) and Della Nave et al All registrations were similar but in the worst case the most superior GM regions were more flattened, most probably due to the greater atrophy of the particular subject compared to the template.…”
Section: Impact Of Cerebellar Atrophy On Cerebellar Pedunclesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Development of imaging biomarkers for SCAs is important to non-invasively track progression of disease pathology and monitor response to interventions. Hence, previous studies utilized MR imaging techniques such as volumetry (11)(12)(13)(14) and spectroscopy (15)(16)(17) to show macrostructural and neurochemical differences between participants with different SCA types and healthy controls. In addition, there are efforts to understand the progression of disease by performing crosssectional analysis in groups at different stages of the disease (18) or longitudinal analysis with follow-up measurements of the same subjects (14,19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VBM is capable of assessing gray matter atrophy by differentiating gray matter from white matter (7). It has been reported that VBM is useful for the diagnosis of cerebellar atrophy (4)(5)(6)(7)(8) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%