Braking Reaction Time After Right-Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of 3 Grafts

Wasserman, Bradley R.; Singh, Brian C.; Kaplan, Daniel J.; Weinberg, Maxwell; Meislin, Robert J.; Jazrawi, Laith M.; Strauss, Eric J.

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.043

Cited by 13 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The BRT averaged across-all-participants was 718 ± 162 ms (minimum 452 and maximum 1192 ms). This is congruent with previous studies that have reported BRT in the range of 720 and 1250 ms (Broen and Chiang, 1996 ; Green, 2000 ; Wasserman et al, 2017 ). In addition, Figure 5A shows the across all participants distributions of BRT independently for each experimental combination and this results are summarized in Table 2 .…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 93%

EEG-Based Detection of Braking Intention Under Different Car Driving Conditions

Hernández

Mozos

Vicente

et al. 2018

Front. Neuroinform.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The anticipatory recognition of braking is essential to prevent traffic accidents. For instance, driving assistance systems can be useful to properly respond to emergency braking situations. Moreover, the response time to emergency braking situations can be affected and even increased by different driver's cognitive states caused by stress, fatigue, and extra workload. This work investigates the detection of emergency braking from driver's electroencephalographic (EEG) signals that precede the brake pedal actuation. Bioelectrical signals were recorded while participants were driving in a car simulator while avoiding potential collisions by performing emergency braking. In addition, participants were subjected to stress, workload, and fatigue. EEG signals were classified using support vector machines (SVM) and convolutional neural networks (CNN) in order to discriminate between braking intention and normal driving. Results showed significant recognition of emergency braking intention which was on average 71.1% for SVM and 71.8% CNN. In addition, the classification accuracy for the best participant was 80.1 and 88.1% for SVM and CNN, respectively. These results show the feasibility of incorporating recognizable driver's bioelectrical responses into advanced driver-assistance systems to carry out early detection of emergency braking situations which could be useful to reduce car accidents.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 93%

EEG-Based Detection of Braking Intention Under Different Car Driving Conditions

Hernández

Mozos

Vicente

et al. 2018

Front. Neuroinform.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After applying our criteria, 5 studies 13,28,29,37,39 with a total of 281 patients who underwent primary ACLR were included in our review (Table 1). Four studies 13,28,37,39 used automobile-simulation devices to evaluate various parameters in 99 patients who underwent ACLR. One study surveyed 182 patients to quantify the time to early functional recovery (including driving in 148 patients) in the first 12 weeks after ACLR.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two studies 13,39 included only patients who underwent right-sided ACLR, while the remaining 3 studies 28,29,37 included both right- and left-sided ACLR cases with comparative analyses. The presence or absence of concomitant procedures was reported in 3 studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Return to Driving After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Salem

Park

Friedman

et al. 2021

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Guidelines for return to driving after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have not been established. Purpose: To review the literature pertaining to driving after ACLR and provide evidence-based guidelines to aid clinicians in counseling patients about driving after ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library using the terms anterior cruciate ligament, ACL, drive, and driving. Studies reporting on functional recovery after ACLR were included when data regarding return to driving were reported. Results: Five studies were included. Two studies included patients who underwent right-sided ACLR. Of these, 1 study evaluated bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and reported that brake response time (BRT) returned to normal approximately 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. The other study found that BRT returned to normal 3 weeks after allograft ACLR, but 6 weeks elapsed after autograft ACLR before values were not significantly different than controls. One study reported that patients who underwent left-sided hamstring tendon autograft ACLR demonstrated BRTs similar to controls within 2 weeks, while those with right-sided ACLR had significantly slower BRTs until 6 weeks postoperatively. Another study including patients who underwent either right- or left-sided ACLR and employed a manual transmission simulator found that 4 to 6 weeks should elapse after ACLR with hamstring tendon autograft. Survey data from 1 study demonstrated that the mean time for patients to resume driving was 13 and 10 days after right- and left-sided ACLR, respectively. Conclusion: BRT returned to normal values approximately 4 to 6 weeks after right-sided ACLR and approximately 2 to 3 weeks after left-sided ACLR. According to 1 study in this review, ACLR laterality should be disregarded for patients who drive manual transmission automobiles, as a 4- to 6-week time period was required for driving ability to reach the level of healthy controls. Future studies should aim to elucidate the influence of graft choice and transmission type on return to driving after ACLR.

show abstract

“…2 4 14 23 Gotlin et al 14 and Nguyen et al 23 examined BRT after right ACL reconstruction and found that BRT returned to preoperative levels by 6 weeks postoperatively. Wasserman et al 40 examined the effects of three types of ACL grafts on BRT at 1, 3, and 6 weeks postoperatively, compared with nonoperative patients. The authors found that patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with an allograft (tibialis anterior) regained normal BRT by 3 weeks, and patients treated with either autograft (hamstring or bone–patellar tendon–bone) regained normal BRT by 6 weeks postoperatively.…”

Section: Lower Extremitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The authors found that patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with an allograft (tibialis anterior) regained normal BRT by 3 weeks, and patients treated with either autograft (hamstring or bone–patellar tendon–bone) regained normal BRT by 6 weeks postoperatively. 40…”

Section: Lower Extremitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Driving after Upper or Lower Extremity Orthopaedic Surgery

Mackenzie

Bitzer

Familiari³

et al. 2018

Joints

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Orthopaedic procedures can affect patients' ability to perform activities of daily living, such as driving automobiles or other vehicles that require coordinated use of the upper and lower extremities. Many variables affect the time needed before a patient can drive competently after undergoing orthopaedic surgery to the extremities. These variables include whether the patient underwent upper or lower extremity surgery, the country in which the patient resides, whether the right or left lower extremity is involved, whether the dominant arm is involved, whether the extremity is in a cast or brace, whether the patient has adequate strength to control the steering wheel, and whether the patient is taking pain medication. The type and complexity of the procedure also influence the speed of return of driving ability. Few studies provide definitive data on driving ability after upper or lower extremity surgery. Patients should be counseled not to drive until they can control the steering wheel and the pedals competently and can drive well enough to prevent further harm to themselves or to others. This review discusses the limited recommendations in the literature regarding driving motorized vehicles after upper or lower extremity orthopaedic surgery.

show abstract

Braking Reaction Time After Right-Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of 3 Grafts

Cited by 13 publications

References 20 publications

EEG-Based Detection of Braking Intention Under Different Car Driving Conditions

EEG-Based Detection of Braking Intention Under Different Car Driving Conditions

Return to Driving After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Driving after Upper or Lower Extremity Orthopaedic Surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About