Breakdowns in the initial patient-provider encounter are a frequent source of diagnostic error among ischemic stroke cases included in a large medical malpractice claims database

Abstract

BackgroundMisdiagnosis of dangerous cerebrovascular disease is a substantial public health problem. We sought to identify and describe breakdowns in the diagnostic process among patients with ischemic stroke to facilitate future improvements in diagnostic accuracy.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, descriptive study of medical malpractice claims housed in the Controlled Risk Insurance Company (CRICO) Strategies Comparative Benchmarking System (CBS) database from 1/1/2006 to 1/1/2016 involving ischemic stroke patients. Baseline claimant demographics, clinical setting, primary allegation category, and outcomes were abstracted. Among cases with a primary diagnosis-related allegation, we detail presenting symptoms and diagnostic breakdowns using CRICO’s proprietary taxonomy.ResultsA total of 478 claims met inclusion criteria; 235 (49.2%) with diagnostic error. Diagnostic errors originated in the emergency department (ED) in 46.4% (n = 109) of cases, outpatient clinic in 27.7% (n = 65), and inpatient setting in 25.1% (n = 59). Across care-settings, the most frequent process breakdown was in the initial patient-provider encounter [76.2% (n = 179 cases)]. Failure to assess, communicate, and respond to ongoing symptoms was the component of the patient-provider encounter most frequently identified as a source of misdiagnosis in the ED. Exclusively non-traditional presenting symptoms occurred in 35.7% (n = 84), mixed traditional and non-traditional symptoms in 30.6% (n = 72), and exclusively traditional in 23.8% (n = 56) of diagnostic error cases.ConclusionsAmong ischemic stroke patients, breakdowns in the initial patient-provider encounter were the most frequent source of diagnostic error. Targeted interventions should focus on the initial diagnostic encounter, particularly for ischemic stroke patients with atypical symptoms.

Systematic review: Association between circulating microRNA expression & stroke

“…If delayed, impeded stroke diagnosis is associated with adverse clinical outcome, increased risk of stroke recurrence, and increased mortality rates. 2 The development of a non-invasive method of rapidly testing patients with a suspected stroke would be invaluable, accelerating stroke diagnosis and implementation of appropriate medical intervention; thus, improving patient outcomes. At present, there are no predictors or biomarkers of ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke that are clinically routine; therefore, it is essential to develop a low-cost, sensitive, and reliable method of stroke diagnosis, but also improve current therapy options for both stroke subtypes.…”

Medical Malpractice and Diagnostic Errors in Japanese Emergency Departments

“… 35 Other reports suggest that failure to assess, communicate, and respond to ongoing symptoms is a common error made by clinicians in the ED and that more attention is needed. 36 Understanding and addressing error-prone situations in this way will help reduce errors.…”

Factors Associated With Diagnostic Error: An Analysis of Closed Medical Malpractice Claims

“…The selection of contributing factors is conceptually driven by the linear diagnostic process and was developed from prior work 14 . This diagnostic process framework is used in peer-reviewed publications 3,9,11 and several of CRICO’s benchmarking reports 13,15,16 . Internally, to ensure consistency with the CRICO framework, TDC conducts peer reviews and audits of the clinical coding on a regular basis.…”