2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-011-9959-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking with tradition: redefining measures for diet description with a case study of the Aleutian skate Bathyraja aleutica (Gilbert 1896)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
171
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
171
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although stomach content analysis appears to be the best way to specifically determine the diet of marine fishes, indices currently used to characterise diet composition remain critical (Brown et al 2012). In most studies, indices used for diet characterisation involve assessment of the number and mass of each prey inside the stomach content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although stomach content analysis appears to be the best way to specifically determine the diet of marine fishes, indices currently used to characterise diet composition remain critical (Brown et al 2012). In most studies, indices used for diet characterisation involve assessment of the number and mass of each prey inside the stomach content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the measurement of the standardised Index of Relative Importance (IRI), calculated as: %IRI = (%N i + %W i ) %F i , cannot be done. The more consistent index, the Prey-Specific Index of Relative Importance (%PSIRI), cannot be used either (Brown et al 2012). This work is therefore based only on the use of W i as analysis of ingested biomass and F i in terms of prey consumption opportunity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prey weight was determined directly or was estimated using regressions of mass versus number. The proportional frequency of occurrence and the abundance of prey in the diet in terms of numbers and weight were calculated with the following equations (Brown et al 2012):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Making matters worse, IRI is nonadditive across taxonomic levels; therefore, IRI values are arbitrarily controlled by the taxonomic resolution chosen by the researcher, which further complicates comparisons among studies (Brown et al 2012). The intrinsic flaws associated with the IRI have caused researchers to develop a more appropriate compound index known as the prey-specific index of relative importance (PSIRI; Brown et al 2012). This new index corrects the mathematical flaws associated with IRI and enables researchers to draw comparisons among studies regardless of the taxonomic level chosen by the researchers.…”
Section: Feeding Habit Shifts In Barndoor Skatementioning
confidence: 99%