2014
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2014-204535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast augmentation with an unknown substance

Abstract: Before the widespread use of silicone implants various foreign substances were injected directly into the breasts. The nature of these materials sometimes remains unknown and can cause various complications requiring surgical intervention. Preoperative diagnostic imaging can help characterise the type and distribution of the injected material, thereby assisting in making decisions regarding treatment. We report a case of breast augmentation with an unknown substance, aiming to highlight some imaging characteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since NMR is used widely by many fields (eg, solid-state physics, chemistry, biology, medical research, and medical diagnosis) to identify the previously unknown composition of a substance, this finding is likely to be highly reliable. 13 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since NMR is used widely by many fields (eg, solid-state physics, chemistry, biology, medical research, and medical diagnosis) to identify the previously unknown composition of a substance, this finding is likely to be highly reliable. 13 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was technically impossible in our case, because PAAG did not remain confined to a single collection ( 1 ). The gel usually forms multiple small locules occupying different layers of the breast, rather than being confined to a single collection, which can then be found even outside of the breast ( 3 5 6 ). Residual PAAG could be left behind, even after the surgery, as in our third case ( 3 5 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a combination of fat suppression, water suppression, T 1 , T 2 and silicone weighting, one is able to distinguish between a wide variety of materials used to augment the breasts through direct injection, such as free silicone, paraffin, saline or autologous fat. 8 In addition, MRI is able to differentiate between reactive silicone granulomatous tissue and breast cancer, even in cases where the two entities are in close proximity. 9 This is an obvious advantage over ultrasound or CT scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%