2018
DOI: 10.1080/2000656x.2018.1533840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast reconstruction with a dermal sling: a systematic review of surgical modifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Not only the measurements required to perform this technique are dependent on the breast dimensions they are also dependent on what size the patient wants because the permanent implant will always have to be smaller than the native breast in immediate one-stage reconstructions. 12 We offered a contralateral mastopexy/breast reduction to all patients who underwent unilateral reconstruction with IDF since the conversion of a ptotic breast into a young breast shape produced a significant asymmetry. 16 In our study, we found a difference between both techniques concerning reconstructive failure that even tough is not statistically significant might be clinically relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 Not only the measurements required to perform this technique are dependent on the breast dimensions they are also dependent on what size the patient wants because the permanent implant will always have to be smaller than the native breast in immediate one-stage reconstructions. 12 We offered a contralateral mastopexy/breast reduction to all patients who underwent unilateral reconstruction with IDF since the conversion of a ptotic breast into a young breast shape produced a significant asymmetry. 16 In our study, we found a difference between both techniques concerning reconstructive failure that even tough is not statistically significant might be clinically relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IDF serves the same purpose of a matrix, providing better coverage and better control of the implant pocket and limiting muscle dissection. 11,12 This study aimed to compare the outcomes and the incidence of postoperative complications between immediate single-stage breast reconstruction using ADM or an inferior dermal sling (IDF).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hansson et al [3] published a systematic review on the number of techniques used and synthesized it down to nine categories (Table 1). An ADF (termed a DS in this paper) can be used in the technique above ('classic' DS) or with a non-Wise pattern mastectomy.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient's own tissue is more elastic and moldable than the artificial products, and stretches naturally over time, and the double layer of dermis and subcutaneous fat provides good coverage and support of the implant. In cases of wound dehiscence at or around the T-junction, the flap underneath provides extra implant cover and reduces the risk of implant exposure (8). The risk of T-junction breakdown in Wise pattern mastectomies may be as high as 25% (12).…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-stage procedures are commonly used, either by removing skin and nipple with expander to implant reconstruction, or breast reduction prior to directto-implant reconstruction (7). Bostwick described the use of a dermal sling and implant for Wise pattern mastectomy and immediate expander prosthesis reconstruction in 1990, and a few modifications have been reported (6,8), however, this method is not yet widely used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%