1985
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90190-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
113
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Van Limbergen and colleagues also described a measurement proposed by Pezner and colleagues 101 to measure nipple asymmetry:…”
Section: Objective Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Limbergen and colleagues also described a measurement proposed by Pezner and colleagues 101 to measure nipple asymmetry:…”
Section: Objective Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interstitial irradiation with small implants has no negative impact on the cosmetic result, while larger implantation volumes have been found to impair it (133). Tumour size itself may be of minor importance, but the total amount of tissue excised seems to influence the cosmetic result (133,136). Recently, surgical techniques of quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy were compared in a randomized trial, and the former technique was found to produce a significantly poorer cosmetic result (85).…”
Section: Cosmetic Results After Breast-conserving Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale is simple and not time-consuming; however, its interobserver concurrence is poor and the outcome can be affected by the experience level of the observers [3]. To overcome this subjectivity in breast cosmesis evaluation, a more objective scale such as breast retraction assessment (BRA) can be used alternatively [4]. The BRA evaluates the distances from the sternal notch to nipples and from the nipples to breast outline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%