2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1984-70332012000500008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breeders' work after cultivar development: the stage of recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The production and distribution of seeds from the URS Brava cultivar followed the flowchart used by the Oat Breeding Program of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) as described by Federizzi et al (2012).…”
Section: Agronomical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production and distribution of seeds from the URS Brava cultivar followed the flowchart used by the Oat Breeding Program of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) as described by Federizzi et al (2012).…”
Section: Agronomical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamics established comparison of cultivars released is considered the most efficient way to evaluate the performance of a breeding programme (Ceccarelli, 2015; Federizzi et al, 2012; Silva Júnior et al, 2019). Several studies have used this methodology to quantify the genetic gain in rice (Reis et al, 2015; Silva Júnior et al, 2019; Streck et al, 2018; Tabien et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of agricultural experiments with rice or any other crop, compiled in databases, can be analyzed together to understand the breadth of information and the data dynamics in a temporal evaluation. The dynamics of plant breeding programs have been analyzed based on the genotype replacement rate over time (Reis et al 2015, Follmann et al 2017, which is calculated from the inclusion, exclusion and renewal of cultivars and is considered the most efficient way to assess the dynamics of performance (Federizzi et al 2012, Ceccarelli 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%