1965
DOI: 10.1021/ja01085a039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridged Ring Systems by Anionic Rearrangement1

Abstract: in bis(2-ethoxyethyl) ether l 5 to the tetracyclic hydrocarbon 14 (C9Hlz, t~~j~1 . 4 9 2 8, v 3067-3055 cm.-l) identical with the product obtained by Wolff-Kishner reduction of the known ketone 15. l6 (15) L. Friedman and H . Shechter, J . Am. Chem. Soc., 81,5512 (1959); 83, 3159 (1961). (16) H. K. Hall, Jr., J . Org. Chem., 25, 42 (1960). We are grateful to Dr. Hall, who kindly furnished a sample of 15 to facilitate identification with material we prepared by independent routes. Bridged Ring Systems by A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attenuation of the rate of p-enolization at C-6 in 7 is also apparent relative to 1 but the usual preference for exo-proton abstraction is evident. Similar regioselectivity of pexchange at the methyl groups were observed, favoring exo-methyl exchange as has been observed in all cases to date.2,'6,'7 Stereoselective syn-exchange at C-1 1 in 6 and 8 is consistent with the notion that steric hindrance plays a role in the process but, as noted above, this is condition^.^ The p-enolate rearrangment of 1 + 2 proceeds about twice as fast as the rearrangement of 6, 3.2 x lop6 s-' vs 1.6 x lop6 s-', and the latter is nearly an order of magnitude faster than syn-11 exchange in 6. Perhaps syn-exchange at the methano bridges in 3, 5, 6 , 8 and 9-11 proceeds through an intermediate species which differs from that involved in the rearrangements of 6 and 8.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…Attenuation of the rate of p-enolization at C-6 in 7 is also apparent relative to 1 but the usual preference for exo-proton abstraction is evident. Similar regioselectivity of pexchange at the methyl groups were observed, favoring exo-methyl exchange as has been observed in all cases to date.2,'6,'7 Stereoselective syn-exchange at C-1 1 in 6 and 8 is consistent with the notion that steric hindrance plays a role in the process but, as noted above, this is condition^.^ The p-enolate rearrangment of 1 + 2 proceeds about twice as fast as the rearrangement of 6, 3.2 x lop6 s-' vs 1.6 x lop6 s-', and the latter is nearly an order of magnitude faster than syn-11 exchange in 6. Perhaps syn-exchange at the methano bridges in 3, 5, 6 , 8 and 9-11 proceeds through an intermediate species which differs from that involved in the rearrangements of 6 and 8.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…The synthetic potential of skeletal rearrangement via homoenolate anions to generate systems otherwise difficult to obtain was also demonstrated in the initial investigations of homoenolization by Nickon et al (4). Treatment of brexan-2-one (4) with t-BuO--t-BuOH at 185" gave a 60% yield of brendan-2-one (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Nevertheless the process has synthetic utility (2) and warrants further investigation to define its scope more precisely in terms of suitable molecular geometries and the stereochemistry of ketonization. At present these features are established only for the bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-one skeleton (1,3) and adamantanone (4) 4While hornoenolization neatly describes the process at fi carbons, more remote proton abstraction can occur.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%