2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging the gap between GRACE and GRACE-FO missions with deep learning aided water storage simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that surface water and groundwater have completely different dynamic behaviours. The change in the surface water is much faster than the change in groundwater (Uz et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that surface water and groundwater have completely different dynamic behaviours. The change in the surface water is much faster than the change in groundwater (Uz et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the GRACE/GRACE‐FO solution, the Swarm measurements have excessive noise in higher harmonics (Teixeira da Encarnação et al., 2020). To suppress this noise, we truncated this Swarm gravity field at d/o 12 (Uz et al., 2022) and applied a 750 km Gaussian filter recommended by Teixeira da Encarnação et al. (2020) to the truncated field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GRACE mission operated from 2002-2017, followed by a gap of 1 year, after which GRACE-FO was launched. Several studies have filled the data gap using deep learning (e.g., Uz et al, 2022), and availability of modeled GRACE data from such studies can be used to extend the study for a longer time. This is beyond the scope of this study and left for a future work.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%