2011
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005191.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief interventions for heavy alcohol users admitted to general hospital wards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
132
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
132
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results concur with those presented in a systematic review of ABI in a general hospital setting, confirming the effectiveness of ABI in reducing alcohol consumption (McQueen et al, 2011). The systematic review of 14 studies indicates that patients receiving brief interventions have a greater reduction in alcohol consumption compared with those in control groups at 6-and 9-month follow-ups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results concur with those presented in a systematic review of ABI in a general hospital setting, confirming the effectiveness of ABI in reducing alcohol consumption (McQueen et al, 2011). The systematic review of 14 studies indicates that patients receiving brief interventions have a greater reduction in alcohol consumption compared with those in control groups at 6-and 9-month follow-ups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, the small number of studies, relatively small sample sizes, and heterogeneity between the studies resulted in large confidence intervals and less certainty as to the true effects of ABI. This systematic review identified the need for more studies within general hospital settings (McQueen et al, 2011). Synergies between the findings are reassuring, and future updates of the systematic reviewincluding newly published studies such as this one-will add to the evidence base.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This figure is substantially higher than the 33% reported in general practices in their study. Bischof et al (2010) are correct that the number of risky drinkers in hospitals is high, and there may be opportunity to intervene, although studies in these settings have been inconclusive, and severity may be part of the explanation, though efficacy has yet to be proven even among those without dependence (Freyer-Adam et al 2008;McQueen et al 2009). The literature to date is clear that the majority of patients identified by alcohol screening in hospitals have more severe unhealthy use (an alcohol disorder) than in general practice settings where alcohol brief intervention is known to have efficacy for those without dependence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%