2016
DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.42.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bronchial carcinoid with massive ossification: A case report and review of literature

Abstract: Case Report AbstractWe report a case of a 47-year-old male with unexplained fatigue, shortness of breath, fever, chronic cough, and weight loss of over 12 pounds over a 3 months period. Chest x-ray revealed complete opacification of the right hemithorax with collapse of the right middle and lower lung lobes and midline shift towards the right. A CT scan with contrast showed a 6 cm mass arising from the right mainstem bronchus that was completely occluding the lumen, causing right lung atelectasis. Histopatholo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, there have been only six such surgically excised cases have been reported [ Table 2 ]. [ 1 3 4 5 6 7 ] Atypical carcinoid was present in one other patient 6 ; metastases were noted in two cases. [ 5 6 ] The pathogenesis is explained based on “osteomimicry” due to the release of osteopontin and osteocalcin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far, there have been only six such surgically excised cases have been reported [ Table 2 ]. [ 1 3 4 5 6 7 ] Atypical carcinoid was present in one other patient 6 ; metastases were noted in two cases. [ 5 6 ] The pathogenesis is explained based on “osteomimicry” due to the release of osteopontin and osteocalcin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 3 4 5 6 7 ] Atypical carcinoid was present in one other patient 6 ; metastases were noted in two cases. [ 5 6 ] The pathogenesis is explained based on “osteomimicry” due to the release of osteopontin and osteocalcin. [ 5 ] In our case, osteopontin immunohistochemistry was negative; staining for osteocalcin was not performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%