2022
DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20220000079004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Collective Institutional Infrastructures for Decent Platform Work: The Development of a Crowdwork Agreement in Germany

Abstract: Working conditions on many digital work platforms often contribute to the grand challenge of establishing decent work. While research has examined the public regulation of platform work and worker resistance, little is known about private regulatory models. In this paper, we document the development of the "Crowdwork Agreement" forged between platforms and a trade union in the relatively young German crowdworking field. We find that existing templates played an important role in the process of negotiating this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing research acknowledges the need to link all dimensions of stakeholders (Gegenhuber, Schüßler, Reischauer, & Thäter, 2022;Kroeger, Siebold, Günzel-Jensen, Philippe Saade, & Heikkilä, 2022;Stjerne, Wenzel, & Svejenova, 2022) via various tools, such as scaffolding (Mair et al, 2016), sustainable value chain linkages (Adiyia & Vanneste, 2018), and platforms (Fernando, 2018). However, future studies should further integrate the dimensions of time and goal orientation.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research acknowledges the need to link all dimensions of stakeholders (Gegenhuber, Schüßler, Reischauer, & Thäter, 2022;Kroeger, Siebold, Günzel-Jensen, Philippe Saade, & Heikkilä, 2022;Stjerne, Wenzel, & Svejenova, 2022) via various tools, such as scaffolding (Mair et al, 2016), sustainable value chain linkages (Adiyia & Vanneste, 2018), and platforms (Fernando, 2018). However, future studies should further integrate the dimensions of time and goal orientation.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these findings, this research makes the following two contributions: First, we contribute to institutional research on digital innovation (e.g., Gegenhuber et al, 2022; Hinings et al, 2018; Tumbas et al, 2018). We outline how the inception and governance of responsible digital innovation in Germany is driven by institutional entrepreneurs across different fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The authors outline the various organizational forms that can address these grand challenges and suggest a framework how to analyze them in relation to their organizational segment and their communicational technological qualities. Gegenhuber, Schüßler, Reischauer, and Thäter (2022) illustrate how new infrastructures of private governance emerge in response to the growing platform economy and the proliferation of precarious platform work. The authors outline how new institutional infrastructures that address grand challenges are based on creatively recombining existing templates to allow multiple actors from different domains to take part in collective organizing efforts.…”
Section: Insights Into the Complexity Of Grand Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%