Building global partnerships through shared curricula for an MPH programme in India and Sri Lanka

Sathiakumar, Nalini; Tipre, Meghan; Wickremasinghe, Rajitha; Bhat, Vinutha; Kadir, Muhammad Masood; Coggon, David; Pathemeswaran, Arunasalem; Kamath, Ramachandra; Arunkumar, Govindakarnavar; Fatmi, Zafar; Smith, Tom E. C.; Pattanshetty, Sanjay; Delzell, Elizabeth

doi:10.1080/17441692.2019.1579850

Cited by 25 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many different types of organizations have led the development of CCPH. These include governmental public health agencies [ 2 , 11 ], membership-based and practice-focused public health associations [ 8 ], independent researchers [ 49 , 50 ], as well as academic associations and institutions [ 51 – 54 ]. Partnership, collaboration, and community engagement are key functions of governance [ 14 , 15 ] and were prominent across the articles.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…• No mention of governance-related activities • Analysis of the content of CCPH only academic associations and institutions [51][52][53][54]. Partnership, collaboration, and community engagement are key functions of governance [14,15] and were prominent across the articles.…”

Section: Inclusion Exclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several articles from the USA involved analyses where sets of CCPH were used to capture workforce development needs and assess perceived changes in competency before and after a training program [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]. Other articles, including a few from Canada, focused on settings where sets of CCPH were used to review academic curricula [30,50,54] and assess students' change in competence after a course, practicum, or program [65][66][67]. Furthermore, actors who were either developing new sets of CCPH for different regions or revising previous versions of CCPH, frequently consulted and referred to existing sets of CCPH internationally [49,50,53,68,69].…”

Section: Theme 2: Different Approaches To Reviewing and Revising Ccphmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Governance of Core Competencies for Public Health: A Rapid Review of the Literature

Sandhu,

Otterman,

Tjaden

et al. 2023

Public Health Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Core competencies for public health (CCPH) define the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required of a public health workforce. Although numerous sets of CCPH have been established, few studies have systematically examined the governance of competency development, review, and monitoring, which is critical to their implementation and impact. This rapid review included 42 articles. The findings identified examples of collaboration and community engagement in governing activities (e.g., using the Delphi method to develop CCPH) and different ways of approaching CCPH review and revision (e.g., every 3 years). Insights on monitoring and resource management were scarce. Preliminary lessons emerging from the findings point towards the need for systems, structures, and processes that support ongoing reviews, revisions, and monitoring of CCPH.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Inclusion Exclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theme 2: Different Approaches To Reviewing and Revising Ccphmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Governance of Core Competencies for Public Health: A Rapid Review of the Literature

Sandhu,

Otterman,

Tjaden

et al. 2023

Public Health Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…FIC/NIH programs have advocated the use of the PEPFAR infrastructure that supports the chronic disease care of persons living with HIV and persons on longterm therapy and monitoring for tuberculosis to build clinical, community, and research capacity for NCDs as well [150][151][152][153][154]. FIC/NIH has also invested in strengthening health systems, developing capacity in policy, and building educational institutions in this area, often with co-funding from other sources [155][156][157][158][159][160][161].…”

Section: Improving Local Research Environments In Lmicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Perspectives on Race in Health Research: Neocolonial Extraction and Local Marginalization

Tankwanchi¹,

Asabor²,

Vermund³

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Best practices in global health training prioritize leadership and engagement from investigators from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), along with more conscientious community consultation and research that benefits local participants and autochthonous communities. However, well into the 20th century, international research and clinical care were rife with paternalism, extractive practices, and racist ideation, with race presumed to explain both vulnerability or protection from various diseases despite scientific evidence for more precise mechanisms for infectious disease. We highlight experiences in global research on health and illness among indigenous populations in LMICs, seeking to clarify what is both scientifically essential and ethically desirable in research with human subjects; we apply a critical view towards race and racism as historically distorting elements that must be acknowledged and overcome.

show abstract

“…FIC/NIH programs have advocated the use of the PEPFAR infrastructure that supports the chronic disease care of persons living with HIV and persons on long-term therapy and monitoring for tuberculosis to build clinical, community, and research capacity for NCDs as well [ 154 , 155 , 156 , 157 , 158 ]. FIC/NIH has also invested in strengthening health systems, developing capacity in policy, and building educational institutions in this area, often with co-funding from other sources [ 159 , 160 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 ].…”

Section: Current Us-led Efforts In Global Health Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global Health Perspectives on Race in Research: Neocolonial Extraction and Local Marginalization

Tankwanchi

Asabor

Vermund

2023

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Best practices in global health training prioritize leadership and engagement from investigators from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), along with conscientious community consultation and research that benefits local participants and autochthonous communities. However, well into the 20th century, international research and clinical care remain rife with paternalism, extractive practices, and racist ideation, with race presumed to explain vulnerability or protection from various diseases, despite scientific evidence for far more precise mechanisms for infectious disease. We highlight experiences in global research on health and illness among indigenous populations in LMICs, seeking to clarify what is both scientifically essential and ethically desirable in research with human subjects; we apply a critical view towards race and racism as historically distorting elements that must be acknowledged and overcome.

show abstract

Building global partnerships through shared curricula for an MPH programme in India and Sri Lanka

Cited by 25 publications

References 10 publications

The Governance of Core Competencies for Public Health: A Rapid Review of the Literature

The Governance of Core Competencies for Public Health: A Rapid Review of the Literature

Global Perspectives on Race in Health Research: Neocolonial Extraction and Local Marginalization

Global Health Perspectives on Race in Research: Neocolonial Extraction and Local Marginalization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About