2018
DOI: 10.21079/11681/26917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Identification Wizard : Version 1.5.1

Abstract: This document discusses the Worldwide Construction Practices Building Identification Wizard program version 1.5.1, which provides a guided user interface that aids in the identification of building construction types and facilitates access to the Worldwide Construction Practices database. It provides an in-depth look into the program's user interface, the Sequential Statistical Evaluation of Building Parameters (SSEBP) algorithm used to determine building types, the export methods used to link information from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All analyses were performed in R version 4.2.2 using the packages ape 5.7–1 [ 47 ], foreign 0.8–84 [ 48 ], ggplot2 3.4.4 [ 49 ], mapplots 1.5.1 [ 50 ], phylolm 2.6.2 [ 51 ], Rphylopars 0.3.9 [ 52 ] and scales 1.2.1 [ 53 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All analyses were performed in R version 4.2.2 using the packages ape 5.7–1 [ 47 ], foreign 0.8–84 [ 48 ], ggplot2 3.4.4 [ 49 ], mapplots 1.5.1 [ 50 ], phylolm 2.6.2 [ 51 ], Rphylopars 0.3.9 [ 52 ] and scales 1.2.1 [ 53 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure of the study largely followed that of Nakayama (2021) for the analysis of MEXT-approved textbooks intended for senior high school students. He adopted a unique approach for the study as currently available corpus-analysis tools compatible with the NGSL such as AntWordProfiler 1.5.1 (Anthony, 2021), the Online Graded Text Editor (Waring & Browne, n.d.), and VocabProfiler (Cobb, 2021a) are not geared toward analyzing the NGSL itself but only imported texts of interest. Another rationale for not using these tools were that they sometimes incorrectly identify the intended meaning of homographs or components of contracted forms (e.g., "I'd" used as "I would" or "I had").…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reduces the number of irrelevant words. Generally, the AntWordProfiler programme (Anthony, 2021) and Range (Heatley et al, 2002), are used to do lexical profiling. The programmes operate by dividing words into four groups.…”
Section: Construction Of Word Listsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tangpijaikul (2014) and Rungrueang et al (2022) decided not to use frequency and range and used keyword analysis instead to construct the Technical Keywords for Business and the Food Service Word List, respectively. Laosrirattanachai and Ruangjaroon (2020;2021) used keyword analysis to put back in words that had been removed because of their appearance in the GSL and AWL during the lexical profiling.…”
Section: Construction Of Word Listsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation