Building retrofits for increased protection against airborne chemical and biological releases

Abstract

Due to concerns about potential airborne chemical and biological (chembio) releases in or near buildings, building owners and managers and other decision makers are considering retrofitting buildings to provide some degree of protection against such events. A wide range of technologies and approaches are being proposed with varying levels of efficacy and cost, as well as varying degrees of applicability to particular buildings and ventilation systems. This document presents the results of an effort to evaluate chembio retrofit options for buildings. A number of retrofit options are identified, and their potential to protect building occupants from a number of generic contaminant releases is evaluated using building airflow and contaminant transport modeling. In addition, a case study is presented in which specific retrofit options were considered for two actual buildings and pre-installation designs and cost estimates were developed. Based on the analyses performed, the results of the case study and other available information, guidance on the application and effectiveness of various retrofits are presented. An economic analysis software tool employing life cycle cost analysis techniques was developed as part of this project, and its use is described in an appendix to this report. The retrofit options considered fall into two categories, the first being stand-alone technologies or devices such as enhanced particulate filtration that are installed and implemented as purchased. The second category includes retrofit approaches that employ operational strategies or building modifications to increase building protection, such as outdoor air purging or building envelope airtightening. The guidance section describes each retrofit technology and approach in some detail, presenting relevant performance data and the level of protection that might be expected from the retrofit. Potential disadvantages and knowledge gaps are also discussed for each technology. The retrofit technologies considered include enhanced particle filtration, sorbent based gaseous air cleaning, ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, photocatalytic oxidative air cleaning, and work area air capture and filtration equipment such as mail handling tables. The approaches include ventilation system recommissioning, building envelope airtightening, building pressurization, relocation of outdoor air intakes, shelter-in-place (SIP), isolation of vulnerable spaces such as lobbies, system shutdown and purge cycles, and automated heating, ventilating and airconditioning (HVAC) operational changes in response to contaminant sensing. The filtration and air cleaning options are noted to have an advantage of always being operational, which is an advantage as long as the systems are properly designed, installed and maintained. However, the lack of standard test methods for sorbent-based gaseous air cleaning and other air cleaning approaches is identified as a critical issue in the application of these technologies. Building envelope air sealing and pressurization can be ...

Modeling Particle Resuspension for Estimating Exposure to Bacillus Spores

“…More work is needed to evaluate application of whole-building simulation for these more detailed analysis methods. Previous work has been performed to simulate building protection schemes with respect to CBR events [45,46], but there does not appear to have been as much done on simulating resuspension due to decontamination-related sampling after such events.…”

An improved method of modeling infiltration in commercial building energy models

“…The height and surface area to volume ratio of the NIST TRF Building is similar to the Primary School, and its normalized net system flow is similar to the Small Hotel. For more details on the NIST buildings, see Persily et al (2007). The average local wind speed adjustments for the Small Office and two NIST buildings are listed in Table 8.…”

Indoor Environmental Resilience

“…Two studies at NIST provide useful information for reducing occupant exposure to potential CBR releases. The first was a study of retrofit options to increase building protection, which included detailed discussion of when these options are most applicable and their advantages and disadvantages (Persily et al 2007). The options relevant to outdoor CBR releases included enhanced particle filtration, gaseous air cleaning, envelope airtightening, building pressurization, relocation of outdoor air intakes, SIP, and HVAC system responses.…”