2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bprint.2016.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building the basis for patient-specific meniscal scaffolds: From human knee MRI to fabrication of 3D printed scaffolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nozzle size had 400 µm of diameter and the 3D scaffolds were constructed using pressures ranging from 250 to 350 kPa at a speed of 5 to 8 mm s −1 . The SF patient‐specific memory‐shape implants of human meniscus were printed through a reverse engineering approach using a semi‐automatic methodology of segmenting meniscus tissue from volumetric MRI datasets and reconstruction of 3D models with an advanced segmentation software . The scaffolds and implants were further frozen at −80 °C for 2 d and freeze‐dried for 3 d (Telstar‐Cryodos‐80, Spain).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The nozzle size had 400 µm of diameter and the 3D scaffolds were constructed using pressures ranging from 250 to 350 kPa at a speed of 5 to 8 mm s −1 . The SF patient‐specific memory‐shape implants of human meniscus were printed through a reverse engineering approach using a semi‐automatic methodology of segmenting meniscus tissue from volumetric MRI datasets and reconstruction of 3D models with an advanced segmentation software . The scaffolds and implants were further frozen at −80 °C for 2 d and freeze‐dried for 3 d (Telstar‐Cryodos‐80, Spain).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Tissue Engineering (TE) field, 3D printing brings several advantages since it can provide reproducibility of the produced implants. Also, it allows the production of patient‐specific implants that closely mimic the native tissue to regenerate in terms of size, shape, mechanical performance, and biodegradability, which can help to improve patient recovery time and to restore biofunctionality . In addition, 3D printing can improve biomimetism of the produced implants, that has been shown to be tremendously relevant for their biomechanical and biofunctional performance .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current TE strategies consider that constructs need to have other properties besides mimicking the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the tissues to 3D segmentation of intervertebral discs: from concept to the fabrication of patientspecific scaffolds be regenerated. The importance of developing patientspecific scaffolds is gaining a new impetus [22,23]. The need for having patient-specific IVD scaffolds is evident, given the fact that the size and shape of IVDs vary from patient to patient, and within a patient they vary within the p osition in the spine [1,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D reconstructions of anatomical structures are indispensable for medical diagnosis, visualization as well as 3D printing of patient-specific implants [22,26,27]. The process of 3D reconstruction of all the relevant tissues is based on the segmentation of medical imaging data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%