Building the Bridge Between Automotive SPICE® and Agile Development

Dorn, Claudia Salazar; Knüvener, Christian L.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85521-5_26

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A comparative analysis approach between existing MMs is carried out. The MM proposed in Digital Transformation is defined in accordance with the ISO/IEC 15504-Process Assessment Model (PAM) [58] and ISO 2015 [1], which has been developed in the next version of ISO/IEC 3300xx and is known as SPICE [1,57]. It aims to create a basis for conducting assessments and provide guidance for presenting assessment results with a rating scale.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Under these conditions, there are stages of digital maturity, which are often referred to as maturity levels [21,22]. SPICE from ISO is a measurement of the maturity level that has been widely adopted in various cross-sectoral maturity models [1], such as government [55], automotive [56,57] and agility in organizations [58]. The maturity model provides large-scale knowledge about the current state of the company and the path to be taken for the implementation of the Industry 4.0 strategy [21].…”

Section: Maturity Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…ISO/IEC 15,504 is enhanced with ISO/IEC 3300xx, which provides a maturity level improvement-based maturity assessment known as SPICE. SPICE has been widely adopted in the measurement of maturity in different domains, such as the measurement of organizational agility [56][57][58], government [55] and cross-domain [1]. The current research develops DX maturity with a bet maturity level based on SPICE.…”

Section: Maturity Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Extended Digital Maturity Model

Haryanti

Rakhmawati

Subriadi

2023

BDCC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Digital Transformation (DX) potentially affects productivity and efficiency while offering high risks to organizations. Necessary frameworks and tools to help organizations navigate such radical changes are needed. An extended framework of DMM is presented through a comparative analysis of various digital maturity models and qualitative approaches through expert feedback. The maturity level determination uses the Emprise test of the international standard ISO/IEC Assessment known as SPICE. This research reveals seven interrelated dimensions for supporting the success of DX as a form of development of an existing Maturity Model. The DX–Self Assessment Maturity Model (DX-SAMM) is built to guide organizations by providing a broad roadmap for improving digital maturity. This article presents a digital maturity model from a holistic point of view and meets the criteria for assessment maturity. The case study results show that DX-SAMM can identify DX maturity levels while providing roadmap recommendations for increasing maturity levels in every aspect of its dimensions. It offers practical implications for improving maturity levels and the ease of real-time monitoring and evaluating digital maturity. With the development of maturity measurement, DX-SAMM contributes to the sustainability of the organization by proposing DX strategies in the future based on the current maturity achievements.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Maturity Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Maturity Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Extended Digital Maturity Model

Haryanti

Rakhmawati

Subriadi

2023

BDCC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For each project, the relevant and mandatory processes are decided at the start of the project. The tailored processes (Dorn et al, 2021) may depend on the target ASPICE process level from the maximum five levels (Mueller et al, 2016;Messnarz et al, 2019), scope and characteristics of the project and tailoring guidelines.…”

Section: Process Tailoringmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Introducing MBSE in organizations requires a cultural change (Bonnet, 2015), and its approaches have to be adapted to the agile development processes (Schindel et al, 2015;Dorn et al, 2021), which are becoming increasingly common meeting 'Automotive software performance improvement and capability determination' (ASPICE). MBSE approaches shall be compliant to the functional decomposition approaches (Ramos, 2012;Estefan, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A generic hierarchical System of Systems Engineering (SOS) Approach for Model based System Engineering (MBSE) Projects

Pandey¹

2022

INCOSE International Symp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Model based systems engineering (MBSE) has been accepted worldwide by many industries, including the automotive industry, for several years. Hundreds of projects have already been developed and deployed using MBSE approaches. MBSE is gaining importance because it provides systems advantageous life cycle processes, such as returns of investments and meeting the demands of global marketplaces, as they become increasingly complex. Consequently, the number and pace of deployment using MBSE approaches will increase in the future.Our current work objective is to define a generic MBSE methodology compatible with Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBOK) functional decomposition principles, 'Automotive open systems architecture' (AUTOSAR) developments and compliant to 'Automotive software performance improvement and capability determination' (ASPICE) processes using the 'systems modelling language' (SysML). We have proposed a generic SysML process framework, a hierarchical system of systems (SOS) engineering approach and automation solutions. We have shown that the proposed solution helps meet the defined objectives. The work is targeted and relevant for automotive industry MBSE practitioners. In general, the research, apart from transportation and mobility industries, can also be used in other industries.

show abstract