2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12542-011-0102-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Burrowing trilobite caught in the act

Abstract: A trace fossil associated with its assumed in situ maker, a holaspid specimen of the trilobite Agraulos ceticephalus (Barrande in Notice préliminaire sur le Systême Silurien et les trilobites de Bohême, Leipzig, 1846), is reported from the middle Cambrian Buchava Formation (Drumian Stage) of the Skryje-Týřovice Basin, Czech Republic. The ichnofossil is preserved on the surface of a mudstone, behind the posterior part of the intact trilobite exoskeleton; this natural association is interpreted as mortichnia. Po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference to the enlarged photographs of topotype hypostomes CAMSM X11474 (Fig. P) and ÚÚG MŠ 267 by Fatka & Szabad () further demonstrates severe discrepancies in all previous interpretations of the unusual hypostomal lateral border, in particular, their placings of the lateral furrow. The hypostome border mainly comprises an interiorly directed, forked, posteriorly‐fused, pair of animal bone‐like structures raised above the depressed posterior lobe; note that the tips of the anterior wings are damaged and it is not possible to know from available specimens whether the ends are rounded or spinal.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Reference to the enlarged photographs of topotype hypostomes CAMSM X11474 (Fig. P) and ÚÚG MŠ 267 by Fatka & Szabad () further demonstrates severe discrepancies in all previous interpretations of the unusual hypostomal lateral border, in particular, their placings of the lateral furrow. The hypostome border mainly comprises an interiorly directed, forked, posteriorly‐fused, pair of animal bone‐like structures raised above the depressed posterior lobe; note that the tips of the anterior wings are damaged and it is not possible to know from available specimens whether the ends are rounded or spinal.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Other, more recent examples are those hypostomes figured by Whittington (, pl. 55, figs 8, 9) and Fatka & Szabad (, fig. 3b) that form the basis of their incorrect drawn figures (Fig.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations