2022
DOI: 10.1080/12460125.2022.2136609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Business agility in technology internet of things projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study used a closed-ended questionnaire and responses from earlier identified 28 experts to identify the impact of enabler variables on one another. In line with existing studies (Sreenivasan and Suresh, 2022; Patil et al , 2023; Thomas and Suresh, 2023), our study also used a five-point Likert scale with “0” to indicate “no influence” to “4”, indicating “very strong influence”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The study used a closed-ended questionnaire and responses from earlier identified 28 experts to identify the impact of enabler variables on one another. In line with existing studies (Sreenivasan and Suresh, 2022; Patil et al , 2023; Thomas and Suresh, 2023), our study also used a five-point Likert scale with “0” to indicate “no influence” to “4”, indicating “very strong influence”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usage of ISM and MICMAC analysis has been done extensively from different perspectives, more to identify the enablers and establish contextual relationships based on their driving and dependence power (Patil et al , 2023; Sreenivasan and Suresh, 2022; Sindhwani et al , 2022). The study used a closed-ended questionnaire and responses from earlier identified 28 experts to identify the impact of enabler variables on one another.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations