Business Cycle Phases in U.S. States

Abstract

The U.S. aggregate business cycle is often characterized as a series of distinct recession and expansion phases. We apply a regime-switching model to state-level coincident indices to characterize state business cycles in this way. We find that states differ a great deal in the levels of growth that they experience in the two phases: Recession growth rates are related to industry mix, whereas expansion growth rates are related to education and age composition. Further, states differ significantly in the timing of switches between regimes, indicating large differences in the extent to which state business cycle phases are in concord with those of the aggregate economy. © 2005 President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Regional resilience in Italy: do employment and income tell the same story?

“…Indeed, it can be the case that Italian regions have asymmetric time of entry in and exit from national recessions. This time mismatching can have more relevant effects if we look at regional resilience by means of the annual output variable (a similar argument has been developed for explaining the different cycles of the States of the US by Owyang et al, 2005). Future contributions could assess the presence of asymmetric resilience in regional output by adopting an endogenous timing of recessions in the spirit of the Markov-switching modelling.…”

Cycles inside cycles: Spanish regional aggregation

“…The first, by Hamilton and Owyang (2009), uses common Markov-switching components in a panel data set. The second, by Owyang et al (2005), applies a regime-switching model to state-level coincident indices. 2 On the whole, when GDP was not available, the attempts to investigate regional business cycles have used employment variables as a proxy for economic indicators of activity and hardly any of them use industrial production indexes as we do in this paper.…”

The employment cycles of neighboring cities

“…The estimation procedure is a straightforward application of Kim and Nelson (1999), the details of which are outlined in Owyang, Piger, and Wall (2005). In this model, an employment cycle is assumed to have two phases-expansion and contraction-which the city economy switches between infrequently.…”