Business Model Research: From Concepts to Theories

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is threefold. Firstly, it provides business model researchers with a structured analysis of the research that is required to enable business model theories to be developed. A schema for analyzing existing research and for discerning the research required to move towards business model theory building is proposed. The importance of conceptual research along with deductive and inductive empirical research is emphasized. Secondly, the extant business model literature is analyzed according to the research schema to highlight current gaps in the research and the progress being made towards theorization. Thirdly, opportunities for future research are identified and thematically categorized to encourage progressive cycles of conceptual-deductive-inductive research and ultimately, theorizing. The need for business model theory building, both in relation to the business model concept per se and concerning the relationships between business models and other phenomena, is the basis of this article.

The Mediating Effect of IT-Enabled Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Readiness on the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Digital Business Model Innovation: Evidence From Indonesia Incumbent Firms

“…This notion is aligned with previous studies that demand empirical investigation of mechanisms whereby transformational leaders advance innovative results. (Cheng et al, 2014;Jansen et al, 2009;Kortmann et al, 2014) This research utilized a pure deductive empirical approach to investigate the relationship between DBMI and their key antecedents (Lambert & Montemari, 2017) for established B2C and B2B2C firms in Indonesia. The research problem addresses a key question of whether the role of TL is impacting DBMI, either directly or indirectly through organizational readiness for digital innovation (ORDI) and ITeDC.…”

Designing business model taxonomies – synthesis and guidance from information systems research

“…We divided the sample to have an initial empirical set of objects for design and, at least, a second group to validate the findings against more objects 3 Empirical-to-Conceptual 15 Another empirical-to-conceptual iteration is necessary to test the finding from the 2 nd iteration and refine dimensions and characteristics broad look, at the concept itself. Of course, choosing either path has implications for the degree of generalizability, i.e., either on an industry level or a general, conceptual level (Lambert & Montemari, 2017). However, as both avenues seem reasonable, a dimension for business model taxonomy design should reflect whether it is supposed to be industryindependent or tailored to a particular industry.…”

Managing business model innovation: an innovative approach towards designing a digital ecosystem and multi-sided platform

“…Research on business models and business model innovation is in its infancy and bereft of mid-range theory. To move from business model concepts to theories, researchers should investigate the systematic business model design and business model implementation (Lambert and Montemari, 2017;Souchkov, 2010).…”