Calculation of proton radius to be measured in the Project MUSE

Guglinski, Wladimir

doi:10.4006/0836-1398-31.2.140

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As said Carl Sagan, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, which perhaps will be discovered between 2018 and 2019, when the proton radius will be measured in the PSI proton accelerator (Kohl, 2014). Guglinski (2018) has calculated that proton radius, to be measured in the experiments, must be found between 0,62fm and 0,72fm. If this prediction be confirmed by the MUSE Project, it is out of doubt that such result will require a New Physics, with some new principles which are missing in the Standard Model.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On how Bohr model of hydrogen atom is connected to nuclear physics

Guglinski

2018

IJFPS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The atom model of Quantum Mechanics (QM) was conceived from an unsolved paradox. Indeed, Schrödinger's equation has been deducted by considering a free electron, but it is applied for the atom, where the electron is inside a potential. In order to eliminate the nonsense, quantum theorists proposed a ridiculous postulate: they claim it makes sense to use the equation because it gives results in agreement to experimental data. The unsolved paradox evidences that Schrödinger's equation cannot be applied to the physical conditions considered in the QM atom model, and that his equation actually requires some special conditions not considered in the theory (for instance, the electron helical trajectory, rejected by Heisenberg). The banishment of the aether has introduced several paradoxes in the development of Theoretical Physics. And because the theorists have neglected other paradox (from the mathematical probability the spectacular successes of Bohr's hydrogen atom cannot be accidental), these two unsolved paradoxes introduced dramatic consequences in the development of Nuclear Physics.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On how Bohr model of hydrogen atom is connected to nuclear physics

Guglinski

2018

IJFPS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The neutrons used in the beam experiments have lifetime 8s longer that neutrons used in bottle experiments. There is big chance that such discrepancy is caused by the shrinkage of the radius of the neutrons used in the beam experiments (Guglinski, 2018). Their lifetime is 8s longer because within the atomic nuclei the neutron radius is shortened.…”

Section: New Procedures To Collect Data In Jefferson Lab For the Meas...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When a free proton is captured by an atomic nucleus, the energy due to the mass defect is absorbed by the up and down quarks, and their velocities increase. The growth of their velocities increases their interaction with the n(o)-flux (Guglinski, 2018), causing the shrinkage of the proton radius. When a proton exits a nucleus, the proton radius dilates, and the energy gained in the mass defect (when the proton was captured) is converted again in mass, restoring the original 35 mass of the free proton, through the Einstein's equation 𝐸 = 𝑚𝑐 2 .…”

Section: Origin Of the Massmentioning

confidence: 99%

Re-evaluation of Fermi’s theory of beta-decay

Guglinski¹

2018

IJFPS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Another published paper of the author proposes that proton and neutron radii have contraction inside the atomic nuclei, generating a discrepancy of 8s between the neutron lifetime measured in beam and bottle experiments. According to the present theory, the neutron radius in beam experiments dilates from 0.26fm up to 0.87fm during the initial 8s, after which begins the process of decay. The present paper proposes a new neutron model with quark structure d(u-e-u), with an electron sandwiched between two up quarks. It reproduces very well all neutron properties, as for instance the radial charge distribution, impossible to be reproduced considering the current quark model ddu. So, the radial charge distribution of neutrons (obtained from beam experiments, if measured in the first initial 8 seconds of their lifetime) has to exhibit a curve a little different of that measured in 2007 in the Jefferson Lab. Here is proposed to JLab to repeat the experiment under such new condition.

show abstract

“…The enigma is not solved yet from the foundations of the SNP, and theorists are so desperate that some of them are proposing nonsenses, as to suppose that a dark matter particle is created when the neutron decays, a speculation already denied by an experiment (Tang, 2018). The answer for the puzzle is proposed in (Guglinski, 2018a), according to which the difference between the two lifetimes of the neutron is related to its shrinkage inside the atomic nuclei (source of neutron for beam experiments), whereas the shrinkage does not occur in the bottle experiments.…”

Section: Figmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Free neutron structure shown in the paper "Reevaluation of Fermi's theory of beta-decay" (Guglinski, 2018a). …”

Section: Figmentioning

confidence: 99%