2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of radiogenic 26Mg of CAI minerals under high precision isotope measurement by SIMS

Abstract: High precision Mg isotope measurements have been performed to determine radiogenic 26 Mg of CAI minerals by secondary ion mass spectrometry using faraday cup multi-collection system. Terrestrial samples of spinel and augite, and synthetic glasses of melilite and fassaite, were prepared to correct instrumental mass fractionation. Reproducibility of Mg isotope measurements for each standard were limited to ~0.4‰ (2σ). On the other hand, the standard errors for one spot are ~ 0.05‰ (2σ). The poor reproducibility … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which often contain radiogenic 26 Mg (e.g., Itoh et al. ), on the ≤1‰ level they are effectively unfractionated in all solar system materials (Catanzaro and Murphy ; Bizzarro et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which often contain radiogenic 26 Mg (e.g., Itoh et al. ), on the ≤1‰ level they are effectively unfractionated in all solar system materials (Catanzaro and Murphy ; Bizzarro et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is that, except for CAIs. which often contain radiogenic 26 Mg (e.g., Itoh et al 2008), on the ≤1& level they are effectively unfractionated in all solar system materials (Catanzaro and Murphy 1966;Bizzarro et al 2011). Therefore, the Mg isotopic composition of planetary materials represents the solar composition at the & level and any deviation of the SW Mg isotopic composition ≥1& from this baseline is due to solar processes.…”
Section: Introduction Science Behind Sw Mg Isotope Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excess of radiogenic 26 Mg, δ 26 Mg*, was calculated via an exponential fractionation law with coefficient α natural = 0.5128 because natural fractionation for Mg-isotopes is considered to be controlled by evaporation processes (Davis et al 2015). However, the natural mass fractionation deviates from the instrumental mass fractionation of SIMS, and the instrumental mass fractionation also differs among target minerals and among analytical sessions under the measurement conditions (Itoh et al 2008;Kawasaki et al 2017Kawasaki et al , 2018Kawasaki et al , 2019Kawasaki et al , 2020. We determined instrumental mass fractionation, α SIMS , through measurements of terrestrial standards to calculate the excess radiogenic 26 (Catanzaro et al 1966) were used for δ 26 Mg* calculations, although the final corrected δ 26 Mg* values are independent of the reference ratios used.…”
Section: Al-mg Isotope Analysis In Multicollection Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the natural mass fractionation deviates from the instrumental mass fractionation of SIMS, and the instrumental mass fractionation also differs among target minerals and among analytical sessions under the measurement conditions (Itoh et al. 2008; Kawasaki et al. 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020).…”
Section: Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary beam current is about 10nA. Detailed experimental procedures are described in Itoh et al (2008). Measurements were carried out at a mass resolving power of approximately 2000, sufficient to resolve all molecular ion interferences (e.g., 24 MgH + , 48 Ca 2+ ).…”
Section: Sims Measurements Of Oxygen and Al-mg Isotope Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%