2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and performance studies of the balloon-borne hard X-ray polarimeter PoGO+

Abstract: Polarimetric observations of celestial sources in the hard X-ray band stand to provide new information on emission mechanisms and source geometries. PoGO+ is a Compton scattering polarimeter (20-150 keV) optimised for the observation of the Crab (pulsar and wind nebula) and Cygnus X-1 (black hole binary), from a stratospheric balloonborne platform launched from the Esrange Space Centre in summer 2016. Prior to flight, the response of the polarimeter has been studied with polarised and unpolarised X-rays allowi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 for SPHiNX. Once the GRB location is known relative to SPHiNX, the value of M 100 is determined from computer simulations validated at discrete energies by laboratory measurements (Chauvin et al, 2017). Any uncertainty in the GRB localisation will propagate to an uncertainty in PF,PA and increase the MDP (reduce sensitivity).…”
Section: The Sphinx Mission Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 for SPHiNX. Once the GRB location is known relative to SPHiNX, the value of M 100 is determined from computer simulations validated at discrete energies by laboratory measurements (Chauvin et al, 2017). Any uncertainty in the GRB localisation will propagate to an uncertainty in PF,PA and increase the MDP (reduce sensitivity).…”
Section: The Sphinx Mission Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systematic uncertainties caused by imperfections in detector calibration, will be estimated post detector assembly by benchmarking simulations against calibration measurements as done in Chauvin et al (2017); Yonetoku et al (2011).…”
Section: Detector Effects (Efficiency and Energy Resolution)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the results suffer, however, from systematic effects, leaving open questions about the emission mechanisms at work in the observed astrophysical sources. The goal of the PoGO mission is to provide statistically constrained polarimetric observations (a minimum detectable polarization of ∼10% before background subtraction), in a previously unexplored energy range, with well-understood systematic effects, using an instrument that has been extensively calibrated with both polarized and unpolarized beams [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the results suffer, however, from systematic effects, leaving open questions about the emission mechanisms at work in the observed astrophysical sources. The goal of the PoGO mission is to provide statistically constrained polarimetric observations (a minimum detectable polarization of ∼10% before background subtraction), in a previously unexplored energy range, with well-understood systematic effects, using an instrument that has been extensively calibrated with both polarized and unpolarized beams [5].Here, developments of the PoGO mission are collected, leading up to the 2016 flight and a summary of observational results for the Crab and Cygnus X-1. Section 2 gives a description of the PoGO+ payload, including the instrument, attitude control system, and gondola structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupled with state-of-the-art X-ray optics, the field of X-ray polarimetry is now ready to open again after 40 years of silence. The forthcoming launch of space-borne X-ray polarimeters [12] and the many balloon [13] and rocket [14] experiments that are currently planned clearly indicate a growing interest in X-ray polarimetry. This paper is intended to quantitatively show the enthusiasm of the research community for X-ray polarimetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%